ELC1990: Steeltown Rockers

Steeltown Rockers #1-6 by Elaine Lee, Steve Leialoha and others.

I wasn’t planning on doing the Lee comics in chronological order, but I think this may be the earliest one of the ones I’m covering in this blog series, anyway?

(Oh, Here’s an explanation of what this blog series is.)

Let’s read the first three pages of this mini-series:

I’ve always liked Leialoha’s artwork — it’s on the cartoony side of realism, which is the correct side… but his earlier work had all these gorgeous little details, and fun designs and backgrounds. He’s pared it back a lot here: Throughout the series, backgrounds kind of fade a lot of the time…

But I’m really enjoying the storytelling over these three pages: We get a concise view of that guy’s family life, and the short scene with the dad is surprisingly emotional for such a short scene. TV as death, really.

So this is really a comic book, published by Marvel, about a gang of kids starting a rock band? With no super-hero stuff at all? Did Marvel have one of their periodic “let’s try doing something else” periods at the time? And why publish this as a Marvel book instead of an Epic book, where it’d be more of an easy fit?

The copyrights on this book are owned by Marvel (according to the indicia), which makes this all even more puzzling.

Leialoha’s artwork goes super-deformed in the er action scenes, which is fun. But his figures also seem to grow really short, too, which I think is more due to sloppiness.

Lee does the colouring for a single issue, and that’s the one with the best (and most entertaining) colouring job.

It is a very readable book. The dialogue keeps rolling without any hiccups, and Leialoha is a very… clear… storyteller. And reading about these kids putting a band together is entertaining enough.

But we also get a peek at the drama in each of the band members’ families (just a handful of pages from each one), and I’m not quite sure that works as well. There’s just so much drama you can take? Even giving the cat food is dramatic, and it’s just a bit much. (Or whatever it is she’s doing… heating up milk?)

There’s some physical humour, but it’s not really… a funny book? It’s like an 80s teen movie?

OK, they tried selling the final issue by putting “X-Men” on the cover…

… and there’s a song called “Teen Mutant”. Well, OK.

Heh. That’s a kinda fun panel.

Yeah, and there’s drugs (they’re bad, apparently) and alcohol (even worse) in the storyline.

Well, it’s a perfectly pleasant read — nothing that annoys, really. But there’s not much here to work up much enthusiasm for, either.

Amazing Heroes Preview Special #10, page 115:

What do you get when you combine rock ‘n
roll with Marvel Comics? Why, Steeltown
Rockers, of course.
Everything is on the skids in the town of
Steeltown. The mill has closed down,
threatening to take the town with it. For a
group of local teens, the only thing to do is
form a rock band.
The book promises “romance, rock and
roll, rebellion and realism,” and even a few
things that start with other]etters.
The creative team is no stranger to the
subject. Writer Lee wrote the musical play
Starstruck and artist Leialoha has been a
member of the band• “Seduction of the
Innnocent” Let’s hope this will be better than
that Pat Boone title from the ’60s. –TH—

Amazing Heroes #145, page 219:

The book will be completely realistic,
and is aimed at the regular Marvel reader
group—early teenagers—but is hoped to
appeal to girls as well as boys. “There
are no super-heroes, yand not even any
bad guys. Maybe there’s an asshole of
the week,” says Lee. She used her own
childhood experiences and those of her
acquaintances to write the book, but
finds writing a “reality-based” comic
tmk is not always easy, where
the Comics Code is concerned. “If you
have somebody take a drug, do you have
to have five people pop up and tell them
it’s a bad idea, which of course yould
never happen in real life? It’s been hard
because we wanted to deal with the
problems of these kids realistically, and
at the same time, maybe, make it a little
more hopeful, as far as how they solve
their problems. I think that it’s emotion-
ally realistic, for me anyway.

Leonard S Wong writes in Amazing Heroes #179, page 78:

Marvel’s advance hype on Steeltown
Rockers promotes it as “angst in the
X-Men vein—without the mutant
battles.”
I dunno; I just find that description
really amusing. Still, it’s not totally
inaccurate—there aren’t any mutant
battles in this first issue (though there
is a guitar war).
Steeltown Rockers is the story of a
group of blue-collar who sæ
rock music as an escape from their
lives in an economically depressed
city. It’s a pretty familiar idea that’s
been seen before in TV, mwies, and
novels aimed at young teenagers, but
rarely in comics. So kudos to Marvel
for trying something alittle different,
in a format that is potentially acces-
Sible to a young audience.

[…]

Although these are mmiliar charac-
ters they all have individual person-
alities and are interesting enough to
hold the tuder’s attention. Elaine Le
has a very good ear for dialogue. The
story is told via conversations and
actions; thought balloons captions
are almost non-existent.
ne result is a story that moves
quickly and smoothly. The pacing of
this issue is not unlike that of the first
act of a play or mwie (Not
considering Lee’s previous writing
include the Starstruck play
comic book adapntion).
Artwork Steve Leialoha is al’*ays
a welcome sight to these eyes, and this
comic is no exception. Leialoha is one
of the handful of artists who can draw
believeable characters, a necessity for
a “real world” story such as this. As
Lee uses dialogue to pace the story,
Leialoha successfully combines a
variety of art styles throughout it to
set the mood.
Despite the rather formula plot and
characters, Steeltom Rockers is worth
a look. Lee and Leialoha are trying
something a little bit different here,
and while it undoubtedly won’t appeal
to everyone, I found it a lot more
enjoyable (and readable) than Marvel’s
usual super-hero fare.
GRADE: ! ! !

Well, that’s a very reasonable review.

The series has never been collected or reprinted, so there are few reviews of it on der intarwebs, but here’s one:

And for all the working-class melodrama, it’s a really entertaining read. The text is minimal, the art evocative, the story compelling; occasionally sublime, largely ridiculous, totally rock and roll.

Not everybody was as impressed:

On a side note — much to my surprise, in the course of my research on the book I found that Steeltown Rockers apparently has a bit of a following. It even has a Facebook page. So maybe I’m just the one out of touch. Maybe I need more small town poverty experience (Gritty!) to really appreciate Steeltown Rockers. Maybe I need to listen to more early Springsteen and Yngwie Malmsteen. Maybe I need to stop being a snob and understand the inherent beauty and gritty reality of this comic. Or maybe liking a book like Steeltown Rockers is just ironic enough now that it has been co-opted into the new hipster cool.

I couldn’t find that Facebook group, though.

Hm:

“A 1990 Marvel comic about some teens who form a rock band” might sound like an ideal candidate for Nobody’s Favorites in theory, but — stupid title aside — Elaine Lee and Steve Leialoha’s Steeltown Rockers ended up winning me over with its goofy charm.

Oh, there was an interview with the creators in TwoMorrows’ Back Issue #101:

And it was originally supposed to be an ongoing series (according to Lee; Leialoha says that 12 issues were planned), but Hama left Marvel, and the editors there didn’t have much enthusiasm for the project (which had been in the pipeline since 1986), but finally published it as a six-issue mini-series.

I guess not.

Elaine Lee Comics

Starstruck, written by Elaine Lee and with artwork by Michael William Kaluta is one of my favourite comics. It’s certainly my favourite genre comic — it’s an exhilarating reading experience, and seemed to hint at an entirely new way of doing comics.

Over the years, I’ve re-read it many times… mostly because they keep releasing new versions of it, changing and rejiggering parts of it. And it never seems to grow any less powerful.

A couple of months ago, while doing the Epic Comics blog thing, I read The Transmutation of Ike Garuda, and I was flabbergasted: It was great! It’s written by Lee, and that made me wonder: Perhaps Starstruck wasn’t some kind of strange fluke? How was is possible that I had never even considered getting her other books, or even looked into whether she’d done any other comics?

Well, it’s timing, really. In the 80s, as a teenager, I paid attention to what was happening to US comics. I mean, really paid attention. Then I went off to university, and I basically lost interest in anything published by the mainstream publishers. I didn’t buy much, or care much about, anything published by Marvel or DC in the 90s, but just read, you know, art comics and stuff. And most of the things she wrote were published by those two publishers, so I just wouldn’t have heard of them.

Which gave me an idea for a new, shortish blog series: How about if I just bought all the comics she wrote in the 90s, read them, and wrote a bit about them?

As I’m typing this, I haven’t read any of them, and I’m hoping that they’re going to turn out to be great. Otherwise this blog series is going to be slightly embarrassing? I mean, it’ll just be me griping about some thirty year old comics? That’s no fun.

But… Clive Barker Saint Sinner? And an Indiana Jones adaptation?

Perhaps this wasn’t a good idea anyway. *gulp*

Wish me luck.

I’ll be aiming for a couple of posts per week.

Officially The Best Redux

As a contrast, after watching a year’s worth of Netflix movies, I thought it would be fun to watch all the films on the Sight & Sound directors’ poll, so I did, and probably bored all you all to death while doing it.

Or was that the COVID?

It was probably the COVID. *crosses fingers*

It’s will probably surprise nobody when I say that the movies on that list are, on the whole, pretty spiffy. I had fun! I discovered a whole bunch of great movies that I hadn’t seen before, so: Mission accomplished.

But… it’s a list that has some… uhm… issues. Here’s the list of movies:

Pos

 

Year

Title

 

BT

#1

1953

Tokyo Story

Y

#2

1941

Citizen Kane

N

#2

1968

2001: A Space Odyssey

N

#4

1963

X

#5

1976

Taxi Driver

N

#6

1979

Apocalypse Now

N

#7

1972

The Godfather

N

#7

1958

Vertigo

N

#9

1975

Mirror

Y

#10

1948

The Bicycle Thieves

N

#11

1960

Breathless

N

#12

1980

Raging Bull

N

#13

1966

Andrei Rublev

N

#13

1959

The 400 Blows

N

#13

1966

Persona

Y

#16

1982

Fanny and Alexander

Y

#17

1954

Seven Samurai

N

#18

1950

Rashomon

N

#19

1955

Ordet

X

#19

1975

Barry Lyndon

N

#21

1966

Au Hasard Balthazar

X

#22

1939

La Règle du jeu

X

#22

1934

L’Atalante

N

#22

1936

Modern Times

N

#22

1927

Sunrise

N

#26

1954

La strada

X

#26

1966

The Battle of Algiers

X

#26

1958

Touch of Evil

N

#26

1955

The Night of the Hunter

Y

#30

1985

Come And See

N

#30

1931

City Lights

Y

#30

1964

Il Vangelo secondo Matteo

X

#30

1974

The Godfather: Part II

N

#30

1960

L’Avventura

X

#30

1973

Amarcord

X

#37

1967

Playtime

Y

#37

1928

Passion of Joan of Arc

N

#37

1961

Viridiana

N

#37

1990

Close-Up

N

#37

1960

La dolce vita

N

#37

1959

Some Like It Hot

Y

#37

1956

Un condamné à mort s’est échappé ou Le vent souffle où il veut

X

#44

1968

Hour of the Wolf

N

#44

1960

The Apartment

Y

#44

1968

Once Upon a Time in the West

N

#44

1963

Le mépris

X

#48

1960

Psycho

N

#48

1985

Shoah

X

#48

1990

Goodfellas

Y

#48

1954

Rear Window

Y

#48

1929

Man with a Movie Camera

N

#48

1955

Pather Panchali

Y

#48

1959

Pickpocket

X

#48

1956

The Searchers

Y

#48

1962

Lawrence of Arabia

N

#48

1962

L’eclisse

X

#48

1975

One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest

N

#59

1937

La grande illusion

X

#59

1966

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

N

#59

1986

Blue Velvet

N

#59

1970

Il conformista

X

#59

1974

A Woman Under the Influence

Y

#59

1972

Aguirre, Wrath of God

N

#59

1964

Gertrud

X

#59

1966

Blow Up

X

#67

1952

Singin’ in the Rain

Y

#67

2000

In The Mood For Love

Y

#67

1954

Journey to Italy

Y

#67

1950

Sunset Blvd.

N

#67

1982

Blade Runner

N

#67

1962

Vivre sa vie

Y

#67

1973

Badlands

N

#67

1953

Ugetsu Monogatari

N

#75

1975

Jaws

Y

#75

1950

Los Olvidados

X

#75

1969

The Wild Bunch

X

#75

1970

Husbands

X

#75

2001

Mulholland Dr

Y

#75

1969

Kes

N

#75

1975

Salò o le 120 giornate di Sodoma

Y

#75

1957

The Seventh Seal

N

#75

1980

The Shining

N

#75

2005

Hidden

X

#75

1973

Angst essen Seele auf

X

#75

1971

A Clockwork Orange

N

#75

2007

There Will Be Blood

N

#75

1926

The General

N

#75

1925

Battleship Potemkin

N

#75

1931

M

Y

#91

1967

Le Samouraï

N

#91

1961

L’Année dernière à Marienbad

X

#91

1964

Soy Cuba

X

#91

1973

Don’t Look Now

Y

#91

1983

Sans Soleil

X

#91

1976

The Killing of a Chinese Bookie

X

#91

1983

L’argent

X

#91

1933

Zéro de Conduite

X

#91

1978

The Deer Hunter

N

#91

1925

The Gold Rush

N

#91

1977

Opening Night

X

#91

1999

Beau Travail

N

#91

1973

La Maman et la putain

X

#91

1974

Chinatown

N

#91

1929

Un chien andalou

N

#91

1965

Pierrot le Fou

X

I was going to do a bunch of data-driven charts based on the movies, but the idea didn’t occur to me until I was a few months into watching, and trying to recall data points now is just too much work. I hate work.

But I did do the Bechdel test, since that’s a service I can just query.

Here’s the results: There were 32 movies with no rating (or I was too lazy to figure out under what name the movies were filed under); 23 films that passes the test and 50 films that do not pass the test. Yes, I know the weaknesses of the test — there are experimental movies on the list where nobody speaks at all, and those fail the test, of course. And failing the test doesn’t mean that it’s a bad movie, but it’s… It’s something.

I wonder how many films on the list would fail the reverse Bechdel test (i.e., flip the genders). Persona would, for instance.

It’s not a very diverse list of films, either: I don’t think a single one of these have a black actor in one of the central roles? (Please correct me if I misremember.) The vast majority of the films are from the US or from Europe, and the few that aren’t are from Japan or Hong Kong. (And one from Iran and one from Bangladesh.) There’s a single movie directed by a woman (Claire Denis) and that is also the single movie that is (possibly) about an LGBTQ+ person. (Well, if you ignore Salò, which I think you should.)

This is a list that is overwhelmingly by, and is about, heterosexual white guys.

I’m sure you’re all shocked. SHOCKED I TELLS YA! I brings ya so much exciting news.

I know, I know.

But it is kinda embarrassing, and Sight & Sound already knows:

Female filmmakers also continue to be underserved by the consensus: while a quarter of our voters were women, there were barely nine female-directed titles in our top 250. And while we attempted to extend our invitations to more particular connoisseurs of documentary, animation, experimental and short films, there’ve been few surprises to disrupt the dominance of the ‘art’ feature film – the most notable exceptions being at numbers 8 and 29…

(8 is Man With A Movie Camera and 29 is Shoah on the Critics’ List.)

I was wondering about the distribution of upper class/working class concerns in the films… but that sounds like way, way too much work for me. My guess is… that it’s kinda even? For every Citizen Kane, there’s a Bicycle Thief. But I may well be mistaken.

It’s also a list that is heavily weighted towards straightforwardly narrative films. That is, there’s very few experimental films here. I think there’s like… five?… that don’t have a narrative focus. It’s also very heavily weighted towards deep and serious movies. I love the deepness; I surely does; but just a handful of comedies seems… odd? If I were to do a list of swell flicks, there’d be more of them.

And: There’s a single musical on the list. It’s a fine movie; it’s a delight — but it’s not one I’d even put on my top ten of musicals. But it’s easy to see how it ended up here: It’s muscular and swaggering.

It’s also rather striking how many movies from the 70s are on this list, but probably just an artefact of the age distribution of the directors voting. I mean, I don’t mind watching four movies by John Cassavetes — but it’s… it’s a thing.

This person has done an analysis of the poll over the years. I think the main take-away is that the list isn’t very stable? I’m guessing some of the 70s movies will be gone in the 2022 poll to be replaced by… 80s movies? Dear god! Please don’t have The Goonies on the next edition!

PLEASE!

OTB#1: Tokyo Story

Tokyo Story. Yasujirô Ozu. 1953. ⚄

We’ve reached the end of this blog series, and we go out on a really good one. It’s a really moving film; even more so than that bicycle thief one. I can totally see why this ended up as #1 in 2012: The performances are swell, the cinematography is solid, it’s Japanese, and it’s the most touching movie you’ll ever see.

Central dialogue fraction:

“Isn’t life dissapointing?”

“Yes, nothing but disappointment.”

I watched and blogged about this in 2014.

This blog post is part of the Officially The Best series.