Couture: Wrestling

I vividly remembered there being lots of great imagery in the Love and Rockets calendars from the late 80s.  After just a few hours of looking through boxes, I finally found the 1990 calendar, which features this beauty:

IMG_5580By Jamie Hernandez, and I think that’s probably Rene Titañon.  (I’ve been meaning to re-read all of Love and Rockets, but I haven’t been able to make up my mind whether to just read all the issues chronologically, or read either the Beto or the Jamie stuff first…  The latter might make it easier to follow the storylines, but it feels weird splitting things up that way.)

So, after scanning, it printed it out with “lp -o fitplot”.  And that swapped the orientation, so it’s way wider than I thought it would be.

IMG_5579

IMG_5583But I measured it against a t-shirt, and it fits on an XL shirt.  I thought it might be fun to have a super-wide print, so I just went with it.

(I ripped the silk (i.e. nylon) off of an old frame — I seem to be unable to wash the emulsion off of the screens.  According to the interwebs, I’m either exposing too long or too short, and the Speedball Emulsion Cleaner may be too wimpy.  So I’m stapling new screen fabric onto the screen:

IMG_5578Staple staple staple.  But that means that I can save the screens, which seems fun…)

I didn’t let the emulsion dry long enough (it rested for three hours), so the bits that had the thickest layer of emulsion was still moist.  You can see that at the top, where some of it washed off.  Tsk, tsk.  Well, lesson learned.  Screen-printing isn’t all that much work, but you have to wait a lot for stuff to dry, and I’m kinda impatient.   I should probably only do this on weekends where I can start the screen earlier in the day.  (But the only room that’s dark enough is the toilet, so I can’t pee while things are drying.  *crosses legs*)

I’ll try printing it anyway…

IMG_5582Eurhm.  I didn’t notice the extra wash-off in the general boobal area..  Hm…  perhaps I can cover that up with some gaffa…

I wanted to experiment with printing dark colours on a black t-shirt, and this seems like an ideal image for that kind of thing. So here we go with dark purple.

IMG_5584

Hey, nice!  It’s almost illegible, though, so I should do a second shirt in a brighter colour.

But I’ll count this one as a success.

The minimum turn-around for a print is eight hours, apparently.  First staple the screen, then put emulsion onto the screen.  Then let it really dry for four or five hours.  Then expose for 35 minutes.  Then wash it with a hose, and let it dry for two hours.  Then print, wash the screen and the squeegee, and then cure the print.

Done!

4AD Yearly

After buying the 4AD biography half a year ago (or something), I’ve been planning to read it while listening to everything 4AD has released chronologically.  I mean, you have to.

IMG_5564The only problem was that I didn’t have everything 4AD has released.  I pretty much had everything between 1984 and 1997, where I began to lose interest.

4AD have been really good about including singles and extras when they re-released earlier albums on CDs, so you can usually get everything that (say) The Birthday Party released on 4AD 1980-1983 by just getting the four CDs.  However, there’s a quite a lot of odds’n’ends that haven’t been collected in that manner (like the Rene Halkett/David Jay 7″) and stuff.

So I spent an evening going through the discography  for the 20 first years, placing everything chronologically.  I had to “break out” the bonus 7″ tracks from the CDs and stuff, but it’s mostly straight-forward.  And there’s some judgement involved — I wouldn’t want to listen to all versions of all Gus Gus cd singles, for instance.  There’s a lot of remixes, and that would be boring.  So just one version of each “release”.

IMG_5566And then I ordered everything I didn’t have from discogs.com.  I really like Discogs — people on there are usually smaller businesses, and they have a quite streamlined way to buy stuff.  Of course, buying used stuff from Amazon would be even easier, but Amazon is kinda nasty, right?  So I stay away from Amazon.

And now I have everything!  Everything!  I can finally read the book!  Yay!

IMG_5562I wish there was I way I could make the chronology available for others to listen to, too, but I don’t really see a way to do that without it being all illegal and stuff.

Useful Consumer Review

Anything that’s wireless doesn’t work.

But there’s degrees of not-working-ness.  I’ve had wireless keyboards that drops one in every five keystrokes even though the receiver is only a meter away, and I have keyboards that drop only one in twenty keystrokes over a range of ten meters.

IMG_5556
Cisco wireless router. Fie! Ick!

But the most problematic wireless gear is wifi.  I had a Netgear Access Point, then a … er, I forget, and then a Cisco one, and they all sucked.  I mean, really.  None of them could give reliable networking over ten meters through a couple of walls.  I ended up with the Cisco two meters away, and I still lost teh webs sometimes.

And then I got this Asus RT-AC68U thing.

IMG_5554
The Asus RT-AC68U wifi AP, hiding in a cupboard at the farthest reach of the apartment

By Emacs!  What a difference!

I’ve had it for a month now, and my laptop hasn’t lost connection once!  And the throughput! And latency! It’s unimaginable!  It’s almost like having a wired connection from twenty years ago!  It’s fantastic!

I can even sit on the balcony and work!  I should use more sunblock!  It’s really hot in Oslo this week!

The Eyefi card I’ve got in my camera still can’t get any connection unless it’s less than a meter from the access point.  That kinda sucks.

But a huge numbers of thumbs up for the Asus RT-AC68U. It’s the best wireless router in the history of wireless routers.

(This advertisement has not been paid for.  Actual router functionality hasn’t been tested; I’m just running it in bridge mode as an access point.  May not be applicable to your region.)

Couture: Silk

Today I’m going to attempt a real screen printing.  I’ve selected an image from Daltokyo by Gary Panter — the first drawring from the first strip.

I’m printing on a black shirt, and the drawing is with black lines on a white background.  So I can’t really print the lines themselves, but I have to print the white background instead, so I have to create an inverted print on the transparency.  (It’s very confusing.)

Side note to summarise a bit what I’ve done wrong so far.  And hopefully learned a bit from:

1) There’s a huge difference in transparency quality.  I’ve bought three different “normal” transparencies (often called “overhead transparencies” or “OHP”), and they’re all too “pebbly” to be used for much of anything.  That is, they’re very coarse, so you get a very uneven distribution of ink.  In other words, you get a lot of white spots where you want total blackness.

2) All inkjet printers aren’t created equal.  The first one I had, an HP Officejet, printed out quite badly onto transparencies and other plastics.  Most people who do stuff like this seem to prefer Epson printers, so I got one of those, and it works perfectly.

3) There are different types of squeegees, and if you use a squeegee that’s not meant for printing onto clothes, it’ll be a lot more difficult to get a good result.

4) You need lighting to expose the emulsion.  Look at my professional-looking new rig:

IMG_5544The recipes say “use either a 250W for this exposure or a 150W for that exposure”.  Well, guess what.  It’s virtually impossible to get any incandescent light bulbs in Europe these days, because of the world ending in a heat death or some other kind of trivial thing. But I’ve managed to score two 105W halogen bulbs that approximate 150W incandescents, allegedly.  And I’ve bought two really cheap Ikea desk lamps.

So here we go.  Exposure.  The chart says 16 minutes for 250W and 74 minutes for 105W, so 2x “150W-ish” should be…  35 minutes?…  At 40 centimeters.

IMG_5547Washing the silk.  I take the head off of the shower thingie and blast it.  All the non-exposed bits rise off!  Looking good, but I could perhaps have exposed for five more minutes…

IMG_5548I bought a huge whopping cutting board to have something to strap the shirt onto, so that I have an even surface to print onto.

IMG_5549 And then we just squeegee away.

IMG_5550Result!  Sort of.

IMG_5551

My squeegee action isn’t perfect yet.  I pushed too much ink through on the right there.  Probably because I’m right-handed…

Anyway, if you know what you’re doing (and I’m vaguely starting to), and you have all the right equipment, the turnaround on screen printing is just a few hours. It’s kinda fun and it looks nice once you get the hang of it.

IT”S WORTH IT!!! PLEASE LET IT BE WORHT IT!!!!!1!ONE!!