Useful Consumer Review

Sony has a newish version of their “sporty” headphones branded “Walkman” (or “NWZ-W273”).  They have a built-in mp3 player.  I’ve got big headphones with built-in mp3 players, but it would be nice to have a pair in a more convenient form factor.

IMG_5365I bought the previous Sony iteration, but they were huge and fell out of my ears all the time, so they were basically unusable.  This version is much smaller, so *crosses fingers*.

They come with an impressive number of very small manuals.

IMG_5364 IMG_5363

They also  come with a pretty big cradle (heavier than the headphones). You have to plug the Walkman into the cradle to charge them and transfer data to them.  The cradle is symmetrical, but the headphones have to be put in the right direction, so I got it wrong the two first times.  Tsk, tsk.  Bad design.

IMG_5367Apparently the Walkman doesn’t want me to write anything to the built-in storage in anything but utf8.  When rsyncing to it I get errors like

rsync: mkstemp "/run/media/larsi/WALKMAN/MUSIC/Prize/.06-Ex 
  Pregui\#347a.mp3.vrixrA" failed: Invalid argument (22)

rsync can do anything, though:

[larsi@building ~]$ rsync -av --iconv=utf8,iso88591 \
  --exclude '*.flac' \
  "stories:/music/repository/Arto\\ Lindsay/Prize" \
  /run/media/larsi/WALKMAN/MUSIC/

So what’s the sound quality like?  Surely the Walkman should be charged now after I’ve typed all this…

Geez, there are a lot of teensy weensy buttons on this this…  Ok, after studying it under a magnifying glass, I managed to switch it on.  Oh, nice.  There’s a nice lady telling me what button I just hit.  “Shuffle.”  “Shuffle.  Off.”  She sounds like she’s an actress in a sci-fi tv series.  A slight metallic tinge.

Oh, sound.  Hey, it sounds pretty nice.  There’s quite a lot of bass.  I had never imagined that teensy headphones like this would have so much bass and such “big room” feeling.

There’s a slight hiss if you pump the volume up beyond what’s comfortable.

They block out a lot of external sound.  Since these are in-ear, you end up listening to yourself breathing a bit.  But overall, these are way better than I had thought was possible.

And I tried headbanging a bit now, and they don’t fall out of my ears.  Wow!

Hm…  so there’s buttons to skip to the next/previous track.  And if you press them a longer time, they skip to the next directory!  That’s perfect for skipping to the next album.  Very nice.  Hm.  But when you switch them off and then on again, it starts playing at the start of the current song instead of continuing from where you left off.  That really sucks for listening to podcasts and the like.

But overall I’m really impressed.  I’ll probably start hating them once I start using them for real, but right now, I’m loving them.

My New Horticultural Blog

Due to the exceptionally warm winter, or exceptionally studly plants, the roses on my balcony survived.  But one of the bushes looks kinda…  odd…

IMG_5361 IMG_5360 IMG_5359 IMG_5358 IMG_5357

See?  There’s a white powder thing going on, and there seems to be a lot of spider web action going on, too.  But mainly around the buds.

So is this a disease of some kind?  Or is it environmental?  They’ve been renovating the neighbouring house the last few weeks, and there’ a lot of white dust flowing around everywhere.

But I do think it looks kinda diseased.

Should I get rid of the roses?  I had kinda assumed that they would die during the winter, so I would plant vegetables there this summer…

Mmm.  Peas.

Summer Workwear

When being handy around the house, I prefer using professional workwear, because they have straps to hand the hammer off of, and lots of pockets for tools and screws and stuff.

And now it’s summer, so I went to buy some shorts.

IMG_5343See?  Super practical.

But at the Blåkläder store they also had workwear kilts.

Yes.

So I had to buy one.

IMG_5344

So it’s a rather long strip of cloth that wraps around you once and a half.

IMG_5352 IMG_5351

Hm…  It’s different…

It’s rather a lot cloth, so it’s kinda warmer than you’d think.  Even when worn traditionally.

So I’m not sure whether this is super practical. I’ll give it a try the next time I have to fix something.

Indoors, where it’s not windy.

 

CM&C Redux

Hey, that didn’t take long at all.

IMG_5328
Gaffa is the force that holds the universe together
IMG_5329
Special Effects

What I’ve learned from watching 100 movies and making 100+ cocktails is: 1) There are a lot of bad cocktail recipes out there.  2) New movies suck. 3) The WordPress spell checker doesn’t think that “movie” is a word.

But I swore to never use the word “film”.  Just to annoy people.

Oops.

My selection turned out to be a bit Now That’s What I Call Quite Early 90s Film Club, which is kinda natural, since that’s where I left off.  I tried getting a bit more current by buying dvds3a few handfuls of movies that had won Sundance awards during recent years, but most of them turned out to be lower-ish budget Hollywood-like schmaltz like Beasts of the Southern Wild.  They look kinda indie and interesting, but are excruciatingly boring to watch.

I mean, I do have patience with “boring” stuff as long as it’s good.  (For instance India Song or  Blue.) But when my bullshit detector goes off, I get cranky.

And I have little in the current crop of European art movies, like Antichrist or Irreversible.  And I loathe Haneke.  Basically crappy and dehumanising movies that have delusions of relevancy.  While probably functioning like the R&D division for commercial movies.

Anyway.

I’ve tried scoring the movies based on whether they’re good or not, and not whether I like them.  I do have great taste, though, so these are correlated, of course.  I sometimes like bad movies a lot, and (somewhat less often) I hate some good movies.

Here’s the complete list.  1 star means “awful”, 2 “bad”, 3 “not good, but watcheable”, 4 “not bad, but misseable”, 5 “good”, 6 “fantastic”.

★★★★☆☆1978JubileeDerek Jarman
★★★★★☆1972SolarisAndrei Tarkovsky
★★★★☆☆1981The Pee-Wee Herman ShowMarty Callner
★★☆☆☆☆2009District 9Neill Blomkamp
★★★★★☆1947Black NarcissusMichael Powell, Emeric Pressburger
★☆☆☆☆☆2005Batman BeginsChristopher Nolan
★★★★★☆1938Bringing Up BabyHoward Hawks
★★★★★★1964Bande à partJean-Luc Godard
★★★☆☆☆2008The Dark KnightChristopher Nolan
★★★★★★1996Nénette et BoniClaire Denis
★★☆☆☆☆2012Beasts of the Southern WildBenh Zeitlin
★★☆☆☆☆2005Red EyeWes Craven
★★★★☆☆2005Me and You and Everyone We KnowMiranda July
★★★★★★1963Federico Fellini
★★★★☆☆2004PalindromesTodd Solondz
★★★☆☆☆2010Tron: LegacyJoseph Kosinski
★★★☆☆☆1968Rachel, RachelPaul Newman
★★☆☆☆☆2008Be Kind RewindMichel Gondry
★★★★★☆2009ΚυνόδονταςYorgos Lanthimos
★★☆☆☆☆2011Like CrazyDrake Doremus
★★★★★☆1959Hiroshima, mon amourAlain Resnais
★★★★★☆2004Mean GirlsMark Waters
★★★★★★2012The Hobbit: An Unexpected JourneyPeter Jackson
★★☆☆☆☆1980Rude BoyJack Hazan, David Mingay
★★★★★☆2009The Limits of ControlJim Jarmusch
★★★★★★1975India SongMarguerite Duras
★★★☆☆☆2010L A ZombieBruce LaBruce
★★★☆☆☆2013ElysiumNeill Blomkamp
★★★★★☆2013I’m So ExcitedPedro Almodovar
★★☆☆☆☆2007SuperbadGreg Mottola
★★★★★☆1993BlueDerek Jarman
★★★★☆☆2009Transformers: Revenge of the FallenMichael Bay
★★★☆☆☆1930Menschen am SonntagKurt Siodmak, Robert Siodmak, Edgar G Ulmer, Fred Zinnemann & Rochus Gliese
★★★☆☆☆1996Bottle RocketWes Anderson
★★★★★☆1937Shall We DanceMark Sandrich
★★★★★☆2000In The Mood For LoveKar Wai Wong
★★★★★☆1988ChocolatClaire Denis
★★★★★☆2010Winter’s BoneDebra Granik
★★★★☆☆1963Shock CorridorSamuel Fuller
★★★★★☆1945Brief EncounterDavid Lean
★★★☆☆☆2011Scream 4Wes Craven
★★★★★★1979WoyzeckWerner Herzog
★☆☆☆☆☆2013Pacific RimGuillermo del Toro
★★★★★★2007Paranoid ParkGus van Sant
★★★★★★1983L’ArgentRobert Bresson
★★★★☆☆2007Eastern PromisesDavid Cronenberg
★★★☆☆☆2005New York DollGreg Whiteley
★★★☆☆☆1985SubwayLuc Besson
★★★★★☆1980Berlin AlexanderplatzRainer Werner Fassbinder
★★★☆☆☆2002SolarisSteven Soderbergh
★★★★☆☆2002The Rules of AttractionRoger Avary
★★★☆☆☆1971Two-Lane BlacktopMonte Hellman
★★☆☆☆☆1934Of Human BondageJohn Cromwell
★★★★☆☆2013The Hobbit: The Desolation of SmaugPeter Jackson
★★★★★★1965Pierrot le fouJean-Luc Godard
★★★☆☆☆2002Resident EvilPaul W S Anderson
★★★★☆☆2005The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the GalaxyGarth Jennings
★★★★★☆1953Tokyo StoryYasujirô Ozu
★★★☆☆☆20042046Kar Wai Wong
★★★☆☆☆1999JawbreakerDarren Stein
★★★★★★2006Inland EmpireDavid Lynch
★★★★★☆1990Cry-BabyJohn Waters
★☆☆☆☆☆1970HusbandsJohn Cassavetes
★★★★★☆2012Hunger GamesGary Ross
★★★★★☆2010Sound of NoiseOla Simonsson, Johannes Stjärne Nilsson
★★★☆☆☆1993Three Colours: BlueKrzysztof Kieslowski
★★★★☆☆1930Animal CrackersVictor Heerman
★★★★★☆2004Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless MindMichel Gondry
★★☆☆☆☆2008The Day The Earth Stood StillScott Derrickson
★★★★☆☆2011Midnight in ParisWoody Allen
★★★★★☆1981Death in VeniceTony Palmer
★★★★☆☆1943Destination TokyoDelmer Daves
★★★★★☆1987Out of RosenheimPercy Adlon
★★★☆☆☆1977The Serpent’s EggIngmar Bergman
★★★☆☆☆1995The Flower of My SecretPedro Almodóvar
★★★★☆☆1992Simple MenHal Hartley
★★★★☆☆1988HeathersMichael Lehmann
★★★★★☆2013G B FDarren Stein
★★★★☆☆1994Prêt-à-PorterRobert Altman
★★★★☆☆2013GravityAlfonso Cuarón
★★★★★☆1935Top HatMark Sandrich
★★★★★☆2009White MaterialClaire Denis
★★☆☆☆☆2012Promised LandGus Van Sant
★★★★☆☆2008AdorationAtom Egoyan
★★★☆☆☆2010You AgainAndy Fickman
★★★★★☆1960BreathlessJean-Luc Godard
★★★☆☆☆2013The Hunger Games: Catching FireFrancis Lawrence
★★★★☆☆2011LimelightBilly Corben
★★★★★★1948Bicycle ThievesVittorio De Sica
★★★★☆☆1973Day For NightFrançois Truffaut
★★★★★☆1942To Be Or Not To BeErnst Lubitsch
★★☆☆☆☆2013CBGBRandall Miller
★★★☆☆☆1936Theodora Goes WildRichard Boleslawski
★★★★☆☆1939The Rules of the GameJean Renoir
★★★☆☆☆2009Inglorious BasterdsQuentin Tarantino
★★★☆☆☆2005A History of ViolenceDavid Cronenberg
★★★☆☆☆2010Blue ValentineDerek Cianfrance
★★★★☆☆2006Small Town Gay BarMalcolm Ingram
★★★★☆☆1940Foreign CorrespondentAlfred Hitchcock
★★★★☆☆1948The Red ShoesMichael Powell, Emeric Pressburger

I started CM&C partially because I had too many unseen DVDs on the shelves. After finishing it, I have more unseen movies than I started with.

cocks3

And I have way more booze in the cupboard than anybody should have.

I peeked at imdb scores for the films I was watching, and it seems like virtually all movies get a rating between 6.5 and 7.5.  The only exceptions are truly awful ones, that get 5.7-6.3, and totally horrible fan service ones that get a rating of 8.0-8.5.  Any newer movie with a rating over 7.5 is almost certainly execrable.

Hm…  perhaps I should do a correlation matrix between my ratings and imdb ratings…  but that seems like work.

And now I never have to watch another movie again in my life! Whoho! I have my life back!