Flatpak

I ordered some furniture for my balcony some months ago, and today it arrived. It’s a small balcony, so I thought some small chairs would make sense…

The shipping company said they were going to be delivered in one 47kg package:

And I got heart palpitations, because I hadn’t ordered carry-stuff-up-all-the-stairs service, and how on earth could two small chairs and a small table be 47kg!?

It turned out they’d just strapped the three curiously, but efficiently packaged things onto a big wooden pallet, and the delivery guys fortunately took that thing with them.

Which left me with this IQ test — how do I get those black metal tabs onto the rounded leg section of the table? D’oh! That’s not how it works… rounded things go on the bottom, not the top. Hah! I’m a genius! It only took me *mumble* minutes to figure that out!

Et voilà! Now I can sit out on the balcony like a proper French man, smoking cigarettes and drinking coffee for breakfast while reading Libération!

(I just have to start smoking and drinking coffee first.)

I suddenly remembered that I had bought a battery powered reading lamp some years back… perfect for reading at midnight.

Finally a place I can read performatively in the privacy of my own home.

There’s something abhorrent about what AI produces

Here’s my little thought: Humans find AI output to be subtly disgusting and avoid subjecting themselves to it.

Because that seems to be the only reasonable explanation for stuff like this:

Again and again we see people having an LLM generate text and then somehow avoid reading before posting.

Sure, people are lazy, and laziness is the go-to explanation for everything, but:

We see renowned mainstream book publishers publish books containing phrases like:

“Of course – here you will find the text about artificial turf fields and ball pits in Norway, written in the same literary and discussion style as the rest of your project.”

This means that nobody — no bo dy — read this book before it was published. Not the “author”, not the editor and nobody at the publisher at all. And these are people who like reading stuff normally!

The same goes even more for pictures — I just selected a random example of somebody using an LLM to generate a picture, posting it, and then apologising afterwards when somebody actually looked at the picture and went “eeek!”

The only explanation that makes sense to me is that even the people who use LLMs to generate these things subconsciously find these artefacts to be so offputting that they avoid casting even an eye at the product. Just… “it’s there! get it out! out damned thing!”

What prompted this blog was this head-scratcher of a blog post: “AI-generated blog post images are not cool any more” They’ve never been cool! People have been calling them disgusting all this time!

It just goes to show how people really live in different worlds… You’re innocently scrolling through your feed and then bam! An AI drawing! Eww! Ick!

I’ve run thorough statistical methods on Hacker News and found that 72.3% of all posts end up with an argument about whether the article in question is written by an LLM. Which is understandable: There’s nothing as nausea inducing as reading a blog article and then having the slow realisation that you’re reading LLM slop. It’s led me to avoid reading blog posts that are about AI, because so many people in that sphere stop writing and just have the LLM generate the text.

But LLM output is abhorrent.

In conclusion:

A Farewell to Jetpack Stats

Once again, I got one of these mails from WordpreSs — they’ve determined that this blog is a “commercial site”. They did this once before, and I said “er, no”, and then they went “OK, you’re right”.

Then a few days later, unrelatedly:

I no longer have a blog on wordprEss.com — I selfhost the blogs because their offering was just too restrictive for me — but I kept paying them because I thought I’d support their work. (And they were helpful with customer support for some stuff while I was hosted there, so I had some warm fuzzies.)

But the annoyance from their Jetpack “audit” just pissed me off, so now I’m letting it lapse. So there! *stamps foot*

Before the old stats become irretrievable (I’m running self-hosted stats now), I just downloaded them now to see whether I can do some er insightful er statistics…

Heh, the CSV files are corrupted — when there’s a quote mark in the titles, like the title Foo "Bar" Zot, it shows up in the CSV file as "Foo ""Bar" Zot". That is, as normal the entire field is surrounded by quote marks, so you have to quote the quote marks — which is done by doubling the quote marks (in this CSV dialect). But the second one isn’t, which just breaks everything. *slow clap*

But here’s some charts. Most viewed posts of all time:

Oh, right, the Epstein thing went viral this year. It seems like ages ago.

Where does the traffic come from?

Yes, Google wins here, but wow, Hacker News is really big. But also Twitter, but also because if that Epstein thing. There’s usually very little Twitter traffic.

Countries?

No surprises here.

What kind of stuff is clicked?

Hey, people really like clicking on images on this blog.

Since I’ve been running self-hosted stats the last year, I took the opportunity to do some quick comparison between the Jetpack Stats data and my own, and… yes, there’s big differences. Web stats is very touchy feely now, and there is no “right” way to do it (because of all the AI scrapers that you want to get rid of), but there’s some pretty odd differences.

Overall takeaway is that the Jetpack Stats is about 30% lower than the self-hosted ones… which is, I think, pretty natural, since people who run adblock aren’t counted on Jetpack, but are counted with the self-hosted one.

But there’s odd outliers like Jetpack saying this post has very few readers, while the self-hosted stats says that it’s the most popular post every day almost. 80% of the traffic has a Referrer that points to Duckduckgo, which is odd in itself? Perhaps 90% of people who use Duckduckgo also use adblock? Perhaps it’s all bot traffic that Jetpack successfully filters out? ¯\(ツ)/¯

OK, I just did some further ad-hoc statsing: Out of every fetch of a blog post, 98% are not counted by stats. Out of these 98%, 80% identify themselves as bots, and 20% pretend to be real browsers (or, indeed, are real browsers but just aren’t counted for various reasons).

98% is actually less than I would have guessed — I imagined we were up to multiple nines by now…

Anyway, here’s a list of the most popular blog posts, according to Jetpack Stats:

83638

What’s up with all those equals signs anyway?
45511

The End of Gmane?
32780

Welcome, New Emacs Developers
27601

eww
26217

Adventures in Netflix
25266

10×10%
18998

20×10%
14285

The Only M1 Benchmark That Matters
10811

news.gmane.org is now news.gmane.io
9412

Whatever Happened To news.gmane.org?
8669

A New Package for Making Charts in Emacs: eplot
7317

5×10%
6909

About
5138

Mr. Thomas Woodruff’s Francis Rothbart!: Not Really a Review
5070

Fantagraphics Floppies Redux
4841

Legal Proceedings
4807

Project: Fantagraphics
4121

More Legal Proceedings
3850

Book Club 2025: The Books of Earthsea by Ursula K. Le Guin
3819

Perplexingly Book-Learned Emacs
3649

Let’s Party Like It’s 1999