BTXLV 1968: Hour of the Wolf

Hour of the Wolf (Vargtimmen). Ingmar Bergman. 1968. ⭐⭐⭐⭐★★.

After the Tour de France of Persona, Hour of the Wolf is a bit of a let-down. The scenes seem to carry no weight. Instead of the shots being filled to the brim with (possible) meaning, they’re kinda just… there… here.

But it’s a hard act to follow up.

If you just wipe your mind of all expectations, it’s not that bad.

Max von Sydow is great as usual, and so is Liv Ullmann. As a Norwegian, though, it’s a bit weird listening to her lines, since she’s basically speaking Norwegian (a very Oslo intonation and delivery) but substituting Swedish words whenever the Norwegian equivalent is too far away from Swedish. It’s a construct called “Svorsk”, and it’s disturbing. Even if I try my best not to mind, because it’s immaterial and petty.

If you don’t understand these languages, then I think it’s probably easier to get into the performance.

This post is part of the 87 Bergman Things series.

BTXLIV 1967: Stimulantia

Stimulantia (“Daniel” section). Ingmar Bergman. 1967. ⭐⭐★★★★.

The mid-60s wasn’t Bergman’s busiest period, film-wise. All These Women in 64, Persona in 66, and Hour of the Wolf in 68. Well, OK, for anybody else, that’s a quite impressive schedule, but Bergman had basically done about two films per year until now, so…

Anyway! This is an anthology film: Nine different directors doing their own short film: Some documentary and some not. Bergman contributes some home 16mm footage of his son Daniel. (And then Bergman reads a bit from his screenplay for Hour of the Wolf.)

It’s Bergman’s most sentimental piece EVER… but is it any good? Eh.

The non-Bergman parts are very 60s kinda experimental stuff. Which I like.

(The rating is for the Bergman bit only. The rest is way more starry.)

This post is part of the 87 Bergman Things series.

BTXLII 1964: All These Women

All These Women (För inte tala om alla dessa kvinnor). Ingmar Bergman. 1964. ⭐⭐⭐★★★.

This is Bergman’s directorial colour film debut. Weirdly enough, it’s his second colour film script, and both of them are co-written with Erland Josephson. It’s like they got together to write scripts for colour adaptation…

This is also Bergman’s final comedy. But Sven Nykvist is behind the camera, so it looks nothing like his previous comedies. It’s an uneasy marriage of Bergman/Nykvist’s 60s aesthetic (influenced by Godard?) with an attempt at a 50s farce.

Bergman wouldn’t do another colour film until the 70s.

It was apparently universally critically panned at the time, and was a flop at the box office.

Its hard to dislike a film that has Eva Dahlbeck, Harriet Andersson and Bibi Andersson in the main roles. Is this the final Bergman film with Eva Dahlbeck and Harriet Andersson?

But it’s not a good film. Somehow it reminds me of British satires from later in the 60s like The Bed Sitting Room… That is, it’s pretty dire. OH SUCH SATIRE.

Still… There are fun scenes. Mostly when Jarl Kulle isn’t on screen.

This post is part of the 87 Bergman Things series.

BTXLI 1963: The Silence

The Silence (Tystnaden). Ingmar Bergman. 1963. ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐.

Bergman thought that this would be another box office disaster (like Winter Light), but instead it became the producer’s (Svensk Filmindustri) biggest movie so far.

And it’s not difficult to agree with Bergman (it’s about two women and a boy in a hotel in a country where they’re talking a made-up language), but he hadn’t considered the scandal angle:

The Christian magazine Dagen was the most harsh in its censure, and even though none of its staff had seen the film, they had ‘read enough’ to declare that the film not only showed scenes of intimacy, but also ‘other abominations, such as a girl’s self-abuse’. Pastor John Hedlund summed up their feelings: ‘If Satan disguises himself as an angel of light, however artistic that may be, he is still Satan nonetheless’.

Or the more humorous angle:

Thank you Ingmar Bergman for the truly stimulating film ‘The Silence’! For five years our marriage has been childless. Yet since my wife and I went to see ‘The Silence’, it is with great joy that we can announce that we are expecting an addition to the family. We shall never forget that wonderful film.

Tee hee.

But the film’s, like, brilliant and stuff. Ingrid Thulin (in the first of many films where Bergman tortures her character, I think) and Gunnel Lindblom (after a bundle of minor parts, this is her first meaty on, I think) are absolutely brilliant. Even the boy’s pretty good.

And it’s kinda fun to see Birger Malmsten in a supporting role. He starred in basically the first ten Bergman films, but then disappeared (presumably when Bergman got better actors into his troupe). He’s good here, though.

This post is part of the 87 Bergman Things series.