One More Bergman Thing: Rabies
A few years back, I watched 87 Bergman things, but I was unable to find this TV movie from 1958. A comment on Youtube alerted me to somebody uploading it, and after spending two days downloading it, I’ve now put the movie on Youtube:
Enjoy it before the copyright strike, I guess?
Gotta hand it to the pirate community: After it had been made available, somebody quickly created subtitles, so I’ve added the subtitles (found on Open Subtitles) to the Youtube version.
I haven’t seen the movie yet… so… let’s roll.
Rabies. Ingmar Bergman. 1958. ⚂
[twenty minutes pass]
OK, this is a collection of ten minute (?) scenes? And one person from the preceding scene appears in the next scene? So it’s like a chained series of little tableaux?
That’s cool, but the first scene was … not very interesting, and the second scene, which had some nerve (I mean, it had Bibi Andersson and Gunnel Lindblom; it can’t be totally uninteresting), seemed oddly unresolved.
[fifteen minutes pass]
Well, this hasn’t been er exactly expertly restored or anything:
But it’s really weird: While the scenes themselves are kinda washed-out and stuff, the dust and scratches are super sharp. So I wonder where this leaked copy originated from. My totally uninformed guess would be that somebody transferred this from magnetic video tape (that existed in the 50s, right?) to film sometime later. So the scratches are on the film copy of this, and the bleached-out look is from the magnetic tape?
I’m just guessing! I’m not an expert.
And then somebody’s digitised the film, and then it somehow ended up on a pirate site last year.
In any case… I can see why nobody has … made an effort to make this commercially available: Restoring this into something…. acceptable… for a wider, non-Bergman nerd audience looks like a daunting task.
[ten minutes pass]
If I didn’t know that this was a Bergman movie, I wouldn’t have guessed. Sure, it’s not unusual for Bergman to feature a bunch of long philosophical debates and stuff, but it’s unusual for him to play it this straight when what they’re saying is so … moronic. I mean, it’s on purpose: We’re following (in a string) of people who are either nasty, insane or menial, but what they have in common is that they’re all dumb and they’re all unaware of this and spout their philosophies.
When the sadistic, fascist military guy in the… fourth? segment starts echoing the literally insane guy from the previous segment, it was pretty chilling (I mean, the movie is called Rabies; the nastiness is contagious), but it’s still a lot, sitting here listening to all this… idiocy.
Even the guy that didn’t seem like a sadist turned out to be a… eugenicist or something.
[the end]
Well!
The last 20 minutes makes this all worth it: The author (well, as played by Max von Sydow) meets all the characters, and they tell him off for portraying them this way, and then it all ends with a speech from him. And this all really works. It’s funny and it’s riveting.
This still isn’t a “good movie”, but the final scene makes watching it definitely worthwhile.
October Music
Music I’ve bought in October.
Oopsie! That was more… than… I should have?
Let’s see… it’s not all old stuff, either? It’s a pretty good mix. So what are the most interesting ones? Er… as you can imagine, I haven’t really heard many of these a lot of times, so I don’t really know. But immediate standouts include:
I discovered Melanie de Biasio the other year, and while I think her newer stuff is even better (like Blackened Cities, which is amazing), this old remix album is pretty spiffy.
Oh yeah, I’ve been buying everything by Trash Kit, and it turns out the guitarist there has two other bands, and I think they also sound good? Not sure; only listened to it once so far.
I’m digging it.
Oh, I was reading the Robert Wyatt biography, and there’s a band called The Unthanks that did a live show with songs by Antony and the Johnsons and Robert Wyatt? What a concept! So I got that, and it’s really good, and I’ve now started buying their other albums.
Their follow-up album, The Bairns, released on 20 August 2007, was nominated for the Best Album award at the BBC Radio 2 Folk Awards 2008 and was runner-up for the 2008 Mercury Prize. The album debuted in the UK Top 200 Albums Chart at number 178 in the week after the Mercury Prize award ceremony.
I’m afraid it kinda sounds like it might be music for grown-ups? Eww! Nobody wants that! I guess I’ll find out…
Karen Dalton was really good, too, and an interesting story…
Uhm uhm uhmm… Oh yeah!
I got There’s A Riot Goin’ On by Sly and the Family Stone. Totally not topical, but so weird! It’s like submerged in a murky layer of… murk, and just very very strange. I think I kinda love it.
Anyway, these were the ones that immediately stood out, but I got a lot of good stuff this month… Oh, yeah, the NO album by Boris, too, which is a lot of fun.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
5×10%
Hey! Target reached:
Bragging time! I mean, this is the irregular Emacs update … stats … report… thing…
So, I’m gamifying Emacs development by setting myself a goal of closing (i.e., fixing, triaging, etc) 10% of the Emacs bugs, and since the trend is downwards:
That’s fewer bugs each time. (But harder bugs, so it evens out.) This time it was just 327 bugs… unfortunately, we started at 3270 bugs, but ended up at just 3110, which anybody with a slide rule can see isn’t 327 bugs less than 3270. (How much more I have no idea; I’m not a mathematician.)
I guess people… have just been reporting more bugs lately? Or something? I don’t think all the other people involved with Emacs development have been slacking off, so I think so… Hm… hard to tell from those charts.
In this batch I mainly concentrated on getting submitted, but neglected patches installed. I did this by downloading all the bugs and just grepping for patches — there were about 500 of them that hadn’t been tagged as “patch” (half because they weren’t good patches and half because … just because). So how did that affect the number of contributors:
*gasp*
So from like 40 per month to 95 in September. And for completeness, here’s the number of commits per month:
But now I’ve gone through all the patches, so I guess I’ll have to… *shiver*… start fixing bugs myself! Oh the humanity.
Speaking of which, what I’ve been working on lately is trying to make basic Emacs Lisp functions more discoverable. Taking the s.el as a model. According to Reddit, it’s apparently the Platonic ideal in documentation: Just a list of functions with some examples so that you can see what they do.
You enter the new doc thing most easily via the normal help system, like `C-h f string-join RET’:
Hit enter on that link and:
Eh, the look may need some tweaking…
I saw somebody on Reddit describing reading the Emacs documentation as being forced to read an academic treatise… and I sympathise. I think thorough documentation is important, but sometimes you don’t want to read about all the subtleties and edge cases, but just want a I HAVE A STRING HERE JUST FUCKING TELL ME WHAT TO DO WITH IT list of functions.
I hope this helps. Skimming these shortdocs is probably more efficient than watching a Youtube tutorial, which, I gather, is the other preferred method of learning computer things.
Kids these days! Get off my lawn!
BC&B: Poulet Mistral le Prieuré w/ Tarte aux Pommes Françoise Potel
This is it: The final post in this exciting blog series, where I cook two dishes from Patricia Wells’ Bistro Cooking book (sequentially), and read one book from the shelf that had the most recently acquired books. (Yes, it makes no sense as a blogging concept.)
I’ve only made it about… a fifth? of my way through the cookbook before I ran out of books, so I’ll have to come up with a different, fresh exciting concept to get me through the rest of the book. But today we have… chicken with garlic? Yes. Chicken with garlic.
But first we have to make chicken stock, which has these ingredients.
It’s butchering time! So I basically cut away all the stuff that’s going into the chicken dish itself…
… i.e., these bits…
… so I’m left with the rest of the carcass in a pot.
Then bring it to a boil, and skim skim skim until all the scum is wiped off the streets, I mean the broth, and then dump a bunch of herbs and veggies into the pot.
And then simmer for two to three hours. Looks tasty, eh?
Well, OK, it doesn’t look as yucky once the solids have been removed.
And then the chicken dish itself. It’s got very few ingredients: Basically just chicken, garlic, chicken stock and wine.
As usual, the chicken bits are roasted thoroughly to give them some colour and flavour.
Meanwhile, it’s garlic clove cleaning time. Do you know how much time it takes to de-skin approx. forty cloves?
About the same time it takes to do all the chicken bits, since I have to do them two at a time.
Then the cloves go into the pan…
… and then the chicken bits go back into the pot, along with some wine and chicken stock. Smells dee lish.
Hm… well, the chicken is super dooper juicy, and it’s got a good sear on it. And I love garlic; I do, but — the flavours are pretty one note, which… isn’t surprising. But there’s, like, no shock of deliciousness here… the flavours just seem kinda un-evolved.
I mean, it’s good chicken, but I’ve made several chicken dishes from this book that have been fantastic, and this isn’t. Fantastic.
But this was supposed to be accompanied by a book, and the final book on the shelf was:
Blå by Maja Lunde. I… think I was given this as a Xmas gift? Probably… the year before last? The author’s written a previous best seller which I haven’t read, but let’s read the first three pages together:
Haha! It’s in Norwegian, so you can’t read it anyway. So let’s make dessert instead:
So it’s an apple pie I mean tart.
Pâte-Demi Feuilleté sure sounds more fancy than “rough puff pastry”. On the other hand… “That is sure some rough puff pastry, boy!” So it could go either way. Anyway, that’s the recipe for the tart shell, and it sounds… absolutely tasteless?
Anyways, these are all the ingredients.
The puff pastry basically flour, ice water and butter.
The recipe says that I should be making this on my marble slab. But what do you know! I forgot where I put my marble slab! As one does! Well I never.
So I make a crater of the flour, and dump the ice water and the chilled butter into it…
… and then work it into a dough. That looks like a dough, right?
And then wrapped with saran, and into the fridge for fifteen minutes. I’d forgotten how much waiting is involved when making pies I mean tarts. It’s something to do with the glutens in the flour: If it’s not properly chilled, it tenses up and retracts and you don’t want that.
So some time later, more chilling, I roll it out and pop it over a pie I mean tart pan. This dough is a lot easier to work with than some of the previous doughs this book has made me make: It’s not very sticky at all, and rolls easily without snapping back too much.
So, of course, then it goes back into the fridge for half an hour.
The recipe said to do this! Double the edges. Looks horrible…
And then foil it all up and add some cooking beans to press it down, and then into the oven for twenty minutes.
Meanwhile, I core and de-er-skinify the apples. I should get a new apple corer: It works fine at the actual de-coring thing, but then it’s just impossible to remove the core sample from the de-corer.
And then into a pan with some butter and some sugar.
Meanwhile, the shell has finished baking. And… man, does that taste basic. It’s like… tasting drywall.
Then the cooked apples into the pan. (Which I surrounded with foil just in case the shell is all leaky-ey.)
And then add the filling, which is eggs, sugar, melted butter and vanilla extract. The filling tastes delicious, but… it thing going to turn out to be an omelette with some apples inside!?
Into the oven for half an hour…
It inflated!
And then deflated a bit.
It made it out of the pan! This pastry isn’t puff, man — it’s rough. I mean tough.
Oh, wow. This has much more complex flavours than I thought it would have.
It’s the scorched apples, I guess? It’s got a caramelley sweet thing going on, while still being quite tart. And the egg stuff? Delicious! It’s egg and sugar and butter and vanilla, and it goes so well with the scorched apples.
This is really delicious! I’m so surprised!
The shell is basically inedible, though. It’s super duper tough, but even if you put in the effort to chew it (which is certainly possible), it tastes like… a void. It’s a taste void.
And speaking of voids: The book is kinda really OK totally bad: Every scene is what a sympathetic reader would call “cinematic”, but since I’m basic and nasty, I’ll call those scenes teeveeactic: Every chapter seems designed to be turned into a New Age Of Quality TV scene. It’s horrible! It’s gruesome! OK, so the scenes with the old woman were tolerable, but that guy? I just couldn’t.
So I ditched the book around page 80.
It’s offal! I mean awful!
And that concludes this blog series: There are no more books in the most-recently-bought part of my bookshelf. (Well, the part of the bookshelf that was that part when I started this blog series IT”S ALL SO COMPLIMACATED!)
I do want to make the rest of the dishes in the Bistro book, though, so I’ll have to come up with some other stupid blogging concept to motivate myself to actually do that.
This blog post is part of the Bistro
Cooking & Books series.






























)

%3A+Home+Demos)





%3A+Sometimes+it+Happens)












)














)
)
)








%3A+A+Doughnut+In+The+Sky)
%3A+Fancy)


























































