PX11: The Cardboard Valise

The Cardboard Valise by Ben Katchor (281x222mm)

This one’s got a fun design flourish — it’s got these fold-out handles, which makes the book into a kind of cardboard… uhm… what’s the word… oh, yeah, suitcase.

Katchor had published just one book-length narrative before this — The Jew of New York. All his other collections had been episodic, mostly one-story-per-page kind of strips. (Although he’d often include a longer story to round the collections off.)

This is more of a hybrid collection: It is one long story, but it’s not really a structured narrative. It’s moves in a kind of associative way, almost — we start off learning a lot about Tensint Island, but that’s ditched after a while (Katchor makes the entire island evaporate), so we then go back to New Jersey and spend a lot of time there, but also on a different new island.

We follow two separate characters whose stories intersect at the end. So it’s slightly less dense than the Julius Knipl collections (since we follow a storyline, kind of), and it’s also less dense than The Jew of New York, which was so filled with references that it almost imploded.

But as usual with Katchor, it took me the entire day to read this book. My mind just skids around a lot when reading Katchor.

The book itself is very handsome, but … the paper? It’s so cream-coloured that it seems like a parody of cream-coloured paper. Is it actually white paper and then they just printed everything cream? Or did they just put a lot of cream dye into the paper pulp? It looks really fake and kind of unpleasant.

The other weird thing is that we flip back and forth between these two radically different styles. Well… ok… radically different for Katchor. The page to the left is the style I’m used to seeing — a variety of line weights, sculpted shading possibly done with grey water-colour washes, and a confident lettering style.

Then there’s the page to the right: The lines are really thin, everything looks grey without lot of weight to differentiate anything, the shading looks like it’s… er… something else? Is it Photoshop? I don’t know, but it looks weird. And the lettering looks so offhand. Is the lettering and shading done by somebody’s that not Katchor? Couldn’t see any credits for any assistants…

Were these published in different venues and Katchor used different techniques? The page to the left in a newspaper and the one on the right on the intertubes? It’s pretty odd, anyway.

And while I usually find Katchor’s weird, weird conceits charming, some of those things here just come off as… er… “will this do?”

But, I mean, this is a good book. It’s great! Most of the pages are more like this: Really inspired, and new delights in every panel, like the pose the guy is doing in the second panel, and the “can I help you?” punchline in the final panel, as well as the whole spiel about how much better vitamins are than real food. Brilliant!

I’m also constantly charmed by the way Katchor conjures up these shops and buildings that totally say “New York”, but are also really odd if you just take a second to actually think about it: These windows going from ceiling to floor, and everybody being really close to them, and there’s no distance between the floors. It’s as if all buildings have walls and ceilings that are two dimensional — it’s an unreality that makes them seem more real.

Hm:

So perhaps some contextual research is in order for the reader coming fresh to Katchor to avoid being bewildered, if not overwhelmed, by the sheer verbiage, multi-sensory detail and lack of narrative continuity here.

[…]

Pages could be shuffled from beginning to end and the reader wouldn’t know the difference, because the book avoids all conventional notions of narrative momentum and character development.

That’s just not true — there’s a pretty strong narrative going on here, with Delilah and Elijah and all of that stuff. It’s just a bit distracted.

A parallel dimension that readers might find creatively charged or thematically exhausting.

That’s true. It is exhausting to read.

Oh! That explains it.

The story was originally serialized, as The Jew of New York and his Julius Knipl strips, in various alternative newspapers, and was originally completed in 2000. The collected edition, however, wasn’t released until March 15, 2011—Katchor’s first book in over ten years. In the collected edition, the original strips were left as is, but new material was added “to amplify the through-story”, Katchor said, and the new material can be spotted by careful readers. “I wanted the new pages to look like an annotation, a new kind of drawing”.

Yes:

He’s a brilliant artist but also a baffling one, supreme in his idiosyncratic creation of a baroquely dense fictional universe that has its own internal coherence while fitfully mirroring, in a fudged and misshapen way, the consensual reality we inhabit. As you read a Katchor strip, it is hard to ignore the tone of droll burlesque while being unsure about what, exactly, is being made fun of. This makes reading his work a heady experience, at times even surreal or psychedelic, since his strips induce a pleasant mental buzz even as they unmoor us from reality.

But this is for weak people:

And like Herriman, Katchor is emphatically not a graphic novelist: his strips shouldn’t be read from beginning to end as a continuous narrative, but rather in small doses of about four or five pages a time. You can overdose on Katchor’s richness if you don’t pace your reading.

WEAK PEOPLE!

Hm…

The tourist-trap kitsch and played-up local color Delilah encounters, The Cardboard Valise argues, are merely the most obviously icky manifestation, and logical endpoint, of all nationalism — an inflation of trivial distinctions and accidents of history and geography into matters of all-encompassing aesthetic and political importance. This gives the book’s climax, in which an encounter between Salamis and Delilah leads to the public debunking of a religious charlatan who argues that it’s not our ethics or imaginations or faiths that live on after our deaths, but our acquisitiveness, real pathos and real bite.

Well… I don’t think the book is as straightforward as that, but that’s certainly a valid interpretation. If somewhat reductionist, and if there’s something Katchor isn’t, it’s that.

This blog post is part of the Punk Comix series.

PX08: Gary Panter

Gary Panter by Gary Panter (242x309mm)

This massive box was published by Picturebox in 2008, and I think I got it at the time? Or pretty soon afterwards? When I got it, I was amazed at the… er… weight… of the box. It’s the most paper for the least amount of money ever. (I think they sold these boxes for $60?)

But… I’ve never actually looked at the books before now. I know! So weird. But I have this thing about boxed sets — I’ll buy them with great enthusiasm, but then they sort of languish on the shelves, because they never seem that urgent? I can always read them later? *points to shelves with beaucoup de box sets* When is later gonna happen? Must happen at some point.

But, OK, I’m finally gonna pop these books out of the box.

Man, the box set is so heavy. Let’s see… it’s 4.4 kgs. That’s a lot of paper.

It feels like a real artefact — I like touches like printing even the innards of the box.

Oh! I didn’t notice before — it’s got a little sketch on the bottom (!) of the box. It’s King Kong and some airplanes.

There’s two books — they’re the same dimensions (so they fit into the box nicely), but one is horizontal and the other one is vertical. Let’s look at the horizontal one first.

Those are nice end papers.

We start off the book with two introductions — the first one, by Mike Kelley, is both funny and oddly informative (if you have a decoder ring, which I think I do).

And then there’s an interview with Panter. This makes the book feel a bit front-loaded with text, and I was wondering why they didn’t put some of this further in the book; at this point I just wanted to look at some art and not read any more. But it turns out that every section has a text piece to introduce it, so it makes sense.

The bulk of the first book (the landscape one) is Panter’s paintings. I’d say about two thirds are paintings? We start off in the very early 70s, where Panter is still kinda hippyish in his choices (but already has that Rozz Tox thing)….

… and skip to the late 70s, where he’s gone all punk.

Most of the stuff is unfamiliar to me, but we also get the hits, like variations on the Screamers poster that probably was Panter’s major claim to fame for a few minutes.

Panter’s method seems to involve working through variations on a single theme or technique — we get groups of paintings, like a dozen, that’s are variations in theme…

… or technique. I love this period, with the “off-register” painting technique.

Trey gorge, right?

When we get to the 90s, the paintings become larger and a whole lot less aggressive. And while this book is pretty much impeccable in all other ways (the design, the printing, the binding, the smell), these two-page spreads aren’t the ideal way to print these large horizontal paintings.

I wonder whether Panter still has most of these paintings? I mean, the reproduction’s so good that presumably PictureBox had to have access to the originals… and none of the pages say “from the collection of Rich McBastard”…

Anyway, the paintings section of the book is strictly chronological…

… and then the last third of the book is a bunch of shorter sections, which are also mostly chronological, but it means that we skip back, time-wise. So we get a section of pen-and-ink illustrations, for instance.

And the seldom-seen photocopy-over-magazine-pages medium. Trippy!

As I said earlier, each section has an introduction, and these are informative and interesting. Dan Nadel (the publisher) has made some good choices.

I assumed that this was going to be a book only about the paintings and illustrations, but we get examples of everything that Panter has done, like these very early comics things.

And various bits and bobs.

And even an excerpt from Jimbo in Purgatory. It’s a completist impulse, I guess, but these pages aren’t very readable here. But you get an impression of their insanely intricate look, at least.

I did not know that Panter did little model houses, but we get a section dedicated to these, too…

And then, towards the end, we get his biography.

What a punk!

The entire book is very interesting (and entertaining), but this section is of particular relevance to this blog series. Panter goes over the story behind Rozz-Tox, and how he published it in the classifieds section to get it typeset for free.

And then photocopied it and mailed it out to a bunch of people (and it sounds like everybody were pretty nonplussed about it all). It’s great.

Panter explains that all his comics takes place in Dal Tokyo, and they’re all interconnected, but in… er… somewhat vague ways. He also explains that one of his problems is that he doesn’t want to put any of his characters through anything bad, really, which limits his storytelling options. (But he created the character The Asshole specifically to allow himself to have a character that bad things could happen to.)

There’s a huge amount more here in this book — it covers the Pee-Wee Herman connection, the Japanese connection, etc etc. It’s really jam packed with interesting things, beautifully presented.

So if that’s the first book, what’s in the other book? It seems like we’ve covered everything possible…

The second book is all pages from Panter’s sketchbooks — he’s got more than a hundred of them.

I love this oddball way of presenting them: It’s not explicitly stated, but I guess we’re getting a 1:1 reproduction of the pages, and some notebooks are smaller than others, so they take up less space on the pages in this book. I don’t think I’ve seen notebooks reproduced this way? It feels intimate, in a way.

There’s not a lot of comics reproduced here, but there’s a few pages.

Sketches of the Screamers guy! Cool.

Cool.

There’s a whole lot of sketches about the Waco thing, for some reason…

Finally, we get a selection of the covers of the notebooks.

Paul Karasik has the book on his “best of 2008” list in The Comics Journal #296, page 34:

Gary Panter, Gary Panter (PictureBox)
Wake up, America.
A terrific bargain for so much terrific work. This is one
art book that I keep pulling off my shelf to bathe in. Do
yourself a favor and splurge. Buy this two-volume set now
and a towel.

It’s also featured on a bunch of other people’s lists.

PictureBox created a web site for the book (and a tour), but it’s gone now. But the Wayback Machine has a copy. Looks like fun was had by all.

Aha! The book originally retailed for $95, but it looks like it was actually sold for $60 for a couple of years… So I guess PictureBox printed quite a lot of these? My copies of the books has a little paper thing saying “14571”, but I have no idea whether that’s supposed to be the copy number or just some technical printing thingie. It seems to be a really huge number if it’s they printed that many copies. It’d be tons and tons of cellulose.

Which makes me curious to see what they’re going for these days.

Er… a wide variety of prices… And it seems like a lot (or all of them?) are signed on the top (or bottom).

There’s a lot of these floating around, almost a decade and a half after it was published, so perhaps PictureBox really did print 15K copies? It seems incredible.

Ooh:

This is an interesting interview with Panter:

BLVR: I noticed in that series that sometimes you’ll kill a character off only to have him reappear a few pages later, having survived due to miraculous circumstances.

GP: Well, you never actually see them die. You see them about to die. I love lying to the reader and making it look like something’s happened when it hasn’t. I do feel bad about killing characters, but I don’t feel bad about them doing bad things. Maybe that makes my stories more boring.

BLVR: What happened to the Zongo series?

GP: Nobody was buying them at all.

BLVR: Do you think that was because they were only available in comic-book stores?

GP: Maybe. That’s not where the audience is. Also I included some earlier stuff in the fifth issue that I’d done when I was really young and it was kind of dirty. It makes comic-book stores nervous when they might get arrested if the wrong kid picks up the comic, and they stop ordering them, so then they weren’t in comic-book stores, either. At the time I thought I should stand by my old stuff, but when it was published I was a little like, Maybe I have grown up and shouldn’t be standing behind this. Matt wasn’t happy about publishing some of that, either.

Which explains some of the questions I had about the Zongo series.

As you’ve probably understood already, I’m just typing away at this while I’m googling for reviews of the book… and I can’t find a single one. There’s apparently one in Printmag, but that’s off the webs now.

archive.org to the rescue:

Panter has staked out especially productive territory, which can be detected in the relationship between his paintings and his comics (which are excerpted in this monograph and available in full elsewhere). Panter literally made his mark in comics by bringing the values of painting into the medium with a bold gestural approach and an aggressive style-mixing that were, at the time, still rare for a visual genre that traditionally favored relatively smooth continuity. He accomplished this, moreover, without undermining his cartoon language or narrative flow. Equally remarkable is his ability to simultaneously import cartoon imagery into his paintings without mummifying or ironizing his visual subject. The resulting work in each medium addresses separate formal concerns but clearly belongs to an artistic sensibility, identifying Panter as an artist to be reckoned with.

Still, it doesn’t seem like this publication got the attention it deserved. Perhaps PictureBox just didn’t have a persuasive enough PR division (heh heh) to get it placed in the relevant publications.

This blog post is part of the Punk Comix series.