Couture: Curing

IMG_5597I must be doing something wrong when curing (i.e. heat fixing).  Most of the shirts survive washing just fine, but two of them have dissolved.

Hm…  it was the metallic and the “glow yellow”.  Perhaps they need more curing?

Googling a bit more seems to suggest that curing water based inks with an iron is challenging, since you need to get all the moisture out to get the ink to bond with the fabric properly.  Some people recommend using a heat gun.  Hm…  More stuff to buy, I guess.

Couture: Errata

I remembered that I had a drying cabinet, so I plugged the holes in it (to avoid light leaking in), and suddenly my screen printing process is down to five hours.

IMG_5592 IMG_5593

Man, that’s some good screen printing.

The image is Errata Stigmata by Beto Hernandez, from that calendar previously discussed in previous editions of this blog previously published previously.

Useful Consumer Review

I thought that getting an EyeFi card for my camera would make blogging easier.  I mean, just snap a picture, and then it’s transferred to your computer automatically?  Result!

But the range of the wifi in the EyeFi card is pitiful. You have to leave the camera less than a couple of meters from the access point to have it discover the wireless network.

That’s not the worst bit, though.  If you snap a picture with the camera elsewhere, it’ll try to create its own ad-hoc network.  And then … it apparently tries to connect to it?  Or something?  This is what the screen says:

DSC00704And the only way to make it connect to the real network is to switch the camera off and then on again, and then take another picture, and then it’ll try to reconnect to the real network.

Man, that’s pitiful.  It would be faster to yank the card and put in into an SD-to-USB card manually.

Like an animal.

In conclusion: EyeFi sucks.

Couture: Glow

Funnily enough, all the ink boxes have the same printed instructions no matter what kind of ink is in the box.  And I have two kinds of ink: Regular and “SuperCover”.  And the latter apparently works better with a coarser silk (i.e., lower monofilament nylon thread count).

IMG_5585
Image drawn by Jaime Hernandez

This one is printed with the same thread count I’ve been using all the time, and it’s a”glow” yellow, and it seems to print just fine.  Perhaps it would have been more opaque if I had the right silk, though?  I should try that, as soon as I find somebody that sells the right kind of monofilament.

My squeegee technique is improving, though.  Practice makes slightly less worse.

Hm…   On the one hand, “Each range includes 8 “Glow” fluorescent colours “.  On the other hand, “GLOW COLOURS – Its important to note that Glow only refers to a bright colour tone Glow colours do not ‘glow in the dark’.”

OK, so it’s fluorescent, but it doesn’t glow in the dark.  Check.

 

Couture: Registering

I thought I’d experiment with printing two colours on top of each other, so I did the most technically difficult thing: Print a white under coat, and then a silver top coat, with the same silk.  And a pretty big print.

I printed the white yesterday, and then the silver today.  It turns out that this is really difficult.  The problem is that fabric expands and contracts.  This shirt had contracted horizontally and expanded vertically, so I had to scrunch and pull to try to get it to about the same size as the silk.

IMG_5569As you can see, even after fiddling with it for a quarter of an hour, the results are pretty bad.

IMG_5570So I think if I’m going to attempt anything like this in the future, I’ll have to have to do it faster, so that the fabric doesn’t get a chance to do anything between layers.

But apparently I really botched this print, anyway.  Here’s what happened after I put the shirt through the washing machine:

IMG_5573 IMG_5572

The silver stuff kinda fell off and splattered all over the shirt!  Either I didn’t cure it enough (I ironed it for a while, but perhaps it needed more?) or it’s not good silver.

But I kinda like the splatter effect…  It’s probably going to fall off all over the place, though.