TSP1994: Visions of Heaven and Hell

Visions of Heaven and Hell. Mark Harrison, Leanne Klein. 1994.

This is a documentary TV series about the Internet and technology narrated by Tilda Swinton.

The programme starts with a disclaimer about how difficult it’s to say what the future’s going to be like, but they’re pretty much correct about a lot of what they were predicting. Especially about the impact of the Internet. You can find this and be depressed on Youtube.

“They are always on-line and never off-duty.”

This post is part of The Tilda Swinton Project.

TSP1990: Fruits of Fear

Fruits of Fear. Ngozi Onwurah. 1990.

You can watch this on Youtube.

“Every time you buy a Cape apple you’re buying a bullet to kill our people.” This is a documentary short with a simple message: Boycott South Africa Now. (I.e., in 1990.)

While the message is clear, I’m surprised at how fairly they present Thatcher’s point of view: We do get to hear her full er line of reasoning before it’s rebutted.

“Just don’t buy those apples.”

This post is part of The Tilda Swinton Project.

TSP1989: Cycling the Frame

I saw the follow-up first, The Invisible Frame, without knowing about the existence of this film.  But I went to Berlin last week and we watched them both, in sequence, at the hotel room one night.

They’re really good.  The first film is grainier, of course, but they’re a pretty fascinating pair.  And the entire wall thing is just so bizarre.  I never visited Berlin before it came down, and it’s so hard to imagine it when visiting now…  It’s like a dream.  And not a good one.

Cycling the Frame. Cynthia Beatt. 1989.

This post is part of The Tilda Swinton Project.

The Tilda Swinton Project Reloaded

When I decided to watch all the films Tilda Swinton had appeared in (because reasons) I used imdb as the primary source for her appearances.  I also added a couple I found on her Wikipedia page, but I assumed that imdb had virtually everything of interest.

But then I discovered the 1989 longish short “Cycling the Frame” as the extra on the 2009 film The Invisible Frame.  It seemed pretty interesting!  My faith was shattered!

DRAMA!

So I downloaded the raw imdb data, and there were about 2x more Tilda Swinton entries there than on the web page!

*goes out and buys pearls to have something to clutch*

But it turns out that most of the extra stuff is unlisted for good reasons.  Here’s how it begins:

1976 "La nuit des Césars" {32ème nuit des Césars (#1.32)} [Herself]
1976 "La nuit des Césars" {34ème nuit des Césars (#1.34)} [Herself]
1979 "CBS News Sunday Morning" {(2008-10-12)} (archive footage) [Herself]
1981 "Entertainment Tonight" {(2008-02-26)} [Herself]
1981 "Entertainment Tonight" {(2008-08-15)} [Herself]
1981 "Entertainment Tonight" {(2008-12-09)} [Herself]
1984 "30 minuts" {La catifa indiscreta} [Herself]
1984 "Cinema 3" {(2009-02-28)} [Herself]
1984 "Cinema 3" {(2011-05-19)} [Herself]
1984 "Cinema 3" {(2012-03-15)} [Herself]
1984 "Cinema 3" {(2013-05-30)} [Herself]
1984 "Cinema 3" {(2014-06-12)} [Herself]
1987 "The Media Show" {(#3.10)} [Herself]
1987 "The Media Show" {Edward II (#8.9)} [Herself]
1991 "Charlie Rose" {(2002-01-10)} [Herself - Guest]
1991 "Charlie Rose" {(2004-04-16)} [Herself - Guest]
1991 "Charlie Rose" {(2010-06-21)} [Herself - Guest]
1991 "Charlie Rose" {(2012-02-01)} [Herself - Guest]

Lots and lots of appearances on award shows, talk shows and the like.  Understandably suppressed by imdb on their web pages.

However, there were about 20 films (mostly shorts and documentaries) that seemed interesting (basically everything that’s not a talk show appearance, mention in a film programme, or appearance in a DVD commentary), so I got the ones that were gettable.  I think they’ve all arrived now, so this weekend I’m going to watch them.

Even if imdb didn’t find them worthy of listing on their web pages.

SUV: CSID

Some weeks back, I decided to appify the Concerts in Oslo web page thingie.  Because UX.DSC01954

It’s a Cordova (i.e. Phonegap) app, so I thought it would be, like, no work at all.  And it wasn’t!  Until I started thinking about the added opportunities the Cordova framework gave me, like exporting events to the calendar on the phone, and “social media sharing”, etc.

So, as is my wont, I’ve spent far too much time tweaking this thing, but now it’s feature-complete!  I mean it!  It is!  No more twiddling!

But the reason for this post is to kvetch about Apple.

I mean, we all love that, don’t we?  NOTHING OF INTEREST BENEATH THIS LINE!

First of all, the submission process is klunky and fiddly.  They require you to upload the app via applications that only exist on Apple machines.  Google Play does it all via a web interface.

They require you to pay $99 per year for the privilege of having the app in the store.  Googple Play charges you $25 once, and that’s it.

The approval process is s-l-o-w.  I submitted the app on September 7th.

On the 16th, it was reviewed, and they found that the age settings were wrong, since you can click on things and end up on Youtube, so it should be 12+ only.  I checked “infrequent nudity” and resubmitted.

On the 22nd, they reviewed it again and published it.  By now, the version submitted was way outdated (see the second paragraphs), so I submitted an update, which was approved on the 28th.

On Google Play, the first approval took about four hours, and each subsequent update takes less than half an hour.

So…  three weeks vs. four hours.

Foogling a bit, this seems to be the Apple norm.  An app takes between some days and three months for approval, no matter whether the app is trivial or complex.

(This is where the Apple enthusiast says “just goes to show how much better Apple is at vetting apps”.  But they’re not really.  I can tell from the server logs when they do the testing.  The time it takes for the testing to actually start and I get the “your app is approved” mail is usually ten minutes or so.  They just wait a week or nine before they start testing.)

And I’m not even a Google fan, but Apple stuff is just so annoying.

The final thing I did today was getting images on high-resolution Apple devices to not look as somebody had smeared vaseline over the glass, then spat on it, and then drizzled soot liberally over it.  Or as they call it “scaled it with anti-aliasing”.

Here’s how an Android device  (Samsung 6 something) handles images that needs to be upscaled:

Here’s the same thing with 2x images:

Yes, everything looks a lot better with the 2x images, but the upscaled ones aren’t gruesome.  They just look like the lo-rez images they are.

Compare this to what a hi-rez Iphone does when upscaling:

image_21623927808_o

The horror!  The horror!  And with 2x images:

image_21801257692_o

*phew*

Apple obviously doesn’t do this just to be total dicks, although I supposed that’s part of the explanation.  They probably do this to force people to actually supply 2x images instead of limping along with lo-rez images.  If you’re an Apple enthusiast, you may think this is a good idea.  If you’re not, you probably aren’t delusional.