It’ll End In Tears

I finally finished Facing the Other Way by Martin Aston. It’s tells the story of the record label 4AD, and it’s really good.

I would normally have gulped it all down in a couple of sittings, but I had to listen to all the music 4AD released (sequentially) at the same time?  Right?  And that took a while.

Er…  how much time…

Hey, I’ve got all the music tidily organised, so I can just make the computer count the seconds:

IMG_5694

(I’ve got it all on flac, but I know how to make mp3info count this stuff.)

528776 seconds, which is about one week.  Of course, I didn’t listen to this stuff 24×7 — it took more than a month.  I’d put the next year on, and then read the chapter about that year.  However, the book is so short!  Just a bit more than six hundred pages.  And it covers 20 years (plus a coda), so it’s less than 30 pages per year.

IMG_5695Which means that I finished reading the chapter while the first album of the year was still playing, so I’ve had to read a lot of stuff in between.

Woe is me.

IMG_5696Anyway, back to the book and 4AD.  I started listening to 4AD stuff in 1985, and quickly grew pretty fanatical.  But 1985 wasn’t 2005, and getting ahold of all the stuff 4AD had previously released wasn’t easy.  So my awareness of what 4AD released during the first few years (except the major bands like The Birthday Party and Modern English) has remained pretty spotty.

And they did release some…  non-essential items like “You and I/Cabbage”, or “Nothing/Armour”.  But listening to it all in context for the first time, it all makes sense.  If you’re a 4AD fan-boy, I would recommend replicating the experience.

The book is far from a dry “and then they released this album, and then this EP”.  It has a somewhat novelistic structure.  In the introduction we’re informed that the history of 4AD is basically a tragedy.  We’ll be told of a slow beginning, a monumental artistic triumph lasting a few years, then disillusionment, depression and disaster.

IMG_5697And then the book follows through.  It’s a biography of sorts of 4AD’s owner/boss Ivo Watts-Russell, as the fate of 4AD is tightly entertwined with Ivo and Ivo’s relationships with the artists (particularly Cocteau Twins).

So we get the humble beginnings (1980-1982), the golden age (1983-1989), huge commercial success (1990-1993), slow descent into oblivion (1994-1999), post-Ivo coda (2000-).

As every other 4AD fanatic, I got into 4AD because of the 83-89 period, where 4AD basically released nothing that wasn’t genius.  Cocteau Twins, Dead Can Dance, This Mortal Coil, Pieter Nooten & Michael Brook, etc.  It’s music that’s perfect for having a cult set up around it, and a cult we made.  We spent ages on creating discographies, swapping tapes of rareties and discussing each release endlessly on the 4ad-l mailing list.

This was during The Early Internet Age (1988-95ish), so information about what was really going on was difficult to find. Which makes this book such a thrill to read.  It’s not gossipy, but we’re informed about how and why things happened.

IMG_5698For instance, the most depressing bit about the depressing years we learn is that 4AD fired Heidi Berry and Lisa Germano because their albums weren’t selling enough.  You might not think that would be surprising, but for a record label like 4AD, who had been putting out some pretty esoteric and non-commercial records for more than a decade, dropping two of their most interesting artists for that reason is pretty … depressing.

Even before Ivo sold 4AD, my obsession with 4AD had waned.  During the 90s, 4AD had released more than a few non-essential bands (Cuba, Thievery Corporation, Scheer) and one downright awful one (Spirea X).  After Ivo sold 4AD, things kinda kept on going, but I couldn’t work up much enthusiasm.  And then Beggars Banqued renamed itself 4AD, and it no longer has any identity.  If I pick up an album these days and see that it’s a 4AD album, I get a slight jolt of “oh, hey!”, but…

IMG_5699The Gang Gang Dance album was great, though.

The book ends on an uplifting note.  Ivo is no longer clinically depressed, and people are mostly doing OK.

So: I loved this book.  A 600 page history of a record label sounds pretty dull, but Martin Aston keeps everything moving forwards very pleasantly.  I wouldn’t have minded a book twice as long, but I wouldn’t, would I?

And now I’m going to listen to something else for a while.

Posted in 4AD | Leave a comment

Couture: Redux

IMG_5687

Tools

Screen printing is lots of fun, but I’m getting bored with it now.  And having the floors covered with equipment and brown paper gets old after a month.

IMG_5688

Paint and cutting board

So I’m calling it quits for now.

IMG_5689

Emulsion

I’d like to have said that I was really good a printing now, but I’m not.  My results are very uneven.  Every other screen turns out unusable, and when printing, about one third of the shirts look kinda not-as-intended.

IMG_5690

I bought too many t-shirt blanks

But for every shirt, I felt like I was getting better.

IMG_5691

The production line

Just not actually good.

IMG_5692

Paint splatters

I do love the successful shirts, though.  I’ve been wanting to have those images on a t-shirt since almost before I was a teenager.

IMG_5693

Two much-abused frames

And now I have!  So I can finally return to Gmane and Gnus stuff, and get a grip on the outstanding queue of stuff I Really Should Get Around To Doing.

At least after the music festivals are over in a week or two.

Posted in couture | Leave a comment

Couture: No Coordination

For my final (I think) prints, I’ve selected a couple of Charles Burns drawings.  I wanted to experiment with multi-coloured, but “non-registered” prints.  That is, prints that don’t require sub-millimeter precision:

IMG_5685Instead I just mask off areas with tape and print the same screen several times.  That means that I have to wash and dry the screen between each colour, but I don’t have to do two exposures.

IMG_5686

Look at the colourful result!  Perhaps a bit too colourful.  I should have experimented more in The Gimp with combinations.

But: Success.

Posted in couture | Leave a comment

Kouture: Kat

I’m still not getting a totally consistent production line.  I printed a large Krazy Kat image, and after exposing it, it washed off fine.  Except at the end, where I washed a “w” off I wasn’t supposed to.

IMG_5682So I cut a new one from packing tape and stuck it on.

IMG_5683The result was fine:

IMG_5684

Drawing by George Herriman

But still odd.  Perhaps I’m not letting the emulsion dry for a sufficient amount of time?  This dried for like four hours…

Posted in couture | Leave a comment

Couture: Washing

I’ve been washing off the screens in the bath tub.  The paints are water-based and rinse off pretty easily, but it’s annoying having to wash off any spatters.

So I’ve been looking for a big washing tub with an outlet that I could place directly over the outlet in the bath tub.  And I’ve been unable to find any.

Then, today, it struck me that I do have a drill, and big plastic packing crates are easy to find.

Duh.

IMG_5677

Packing crate

IMG_5678

Wood Drill is Plastic Drill

IMG_5679

Drill baby drill

IMG_5680

I cleverly put a lot of newspapers under where I was drilling. It’s kind on the floor

IMG_5681

Holey Plastic, Man

Posted in couture | Leave a comment

Couture: Bumpy

I wanted to screen-print onto the sleeves of a shirt.  It turns out that’s not trivial:

IMG_5675When the fabric is bumpy (the seam down there), the screen doesn’t make contact properly with the fabric, which makes the print crappy.

So I need something soft-ish under the shirt to ensure proper contact with the screen.  Something rubbery, perhaps…  I’m not quite sure what, but I’ll visit a hardware store tomorrow and see if I find something.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Couture: Upholstery

After printing, you can either reclaim the “silk” (i.e. monofilament nylon) by washing and scrubbing a lot, or you can just pop the silk off and staple a new silk onto the frame.

I prefer the latter, because then I can save the silk for imaginary future use.  Yeah, like I’m ever going to reprint any of these shirts…

Anyway, the main problem with stapling silks is unstapling the silks.  A normal staple remover doesn’t work, because the staples dig into the wood, and you have to dig into the wood, too, to extract the staples.

Enter this tool I just got:

IMG_5676

Upholstery tool for removing staples

I’ve removed the staples from two frames now, and it works pretty well.  I’ve been using a teensy flat-head screw driver until now, and I’ve been stabbing myself a lot.  This tool gives me a lot more control.  It’s totally stab-free.

But it’s not a wonder tool — removing the staples with this tool is slower than with a screw driver and a pair of pliers.

My arms like the lack of wounds tonight, though, so I’m going to continue using it.

Posted in couture | Leave a comment