Spirou

A while back, I launched an in-depth investigation into a claim that French(ey) comics used to be serialised half a page at a time. Somebody on the internet was clearly wrong (because not even French children are that patient).

As I had never myself seen these anthologies, I had to resort to Google for the proof. In the process, I discovered that there’s kinda not a lot of information to be had about the reading experience of these anthologies. In any case, not in any language I could understand.

So the other day I happened upon an issue of Spirou (happened upon on ebay, ahem), and I bought it, and now I have it, and now let’s take a look at it. Since basically all the classic Franco-Belgian comics I grew up on originated in these magazines, I’ve always been curious as to how they looked.

The paper is quite thin and somewhat matte. I had also expected the magazine to be smaller, but it’s almost album size:

(A Yakari album behind for comparison.)

The separation between ads and editorial matter seems, er, not very clear… The top strip is an activity thing, and the bottom one is an ad for Mars.

And there’s a wide outer margin where they place the “A suivre” (to be continued) box. Presumably because they want to have a heading for on all the pages, and since the magazine is basically the same form factor as the albums, you get a wide margin, too.

Some of the pages are full colour, and some aren’t. And we only get a single Smurftastic page, so French kids are smurfing patient: It’ll take almost a year to get the entire story.

And there’s a very, very short recap up there to the right.

Nine of the 50 interior pages are non-comics pages, with a mixture of articles about things boys would find interesting and ads for roller skates and after shave.

But then we get to the meat of the issue: The BD! And they’re almost all presented like this: A two-page spread with “A suivre” at the end. And I thought I knew a lot about these comics, but most of them are completely unfamiliar to me, like Marc Dacier. I mean, it’s probably not good or anything, but it makes me want to start up my French lessons again…

The articles are about sports and cars and stuff like that. With the occasional spot illustration.

Every other double page spread is in red and black instead of being in four colours. I’m not a printing expert, but looking at the signatures of the printing, I think this works out to having printed one side of the paper sheets (before cutting into signatures) in four colours and the other in two colours. So they save some money: Both on colour seps and printing.

OK, perhaps it’s no wonder that I haven’t heard about some of these comics: A few look kinda on the meh side.

Oh! An article about a cool animal. I didn’t know about the fossa, so it’s very edumacational.

I had kinda expected there to be more of a mix of serials and shorter gag comics, but that’s really not the case: There’s a gag on the front and back covers, but otherwise it’s wall to wall (with one exception) serials.

And we learn other languages, too!

Ooo! Space ships!

And here’s the solution to the riddles on the inside front cover, in case you wondered. Antigone and Polyeucte are two of the answers, apparently? French kids, man.

One single strip is allotted four pages…

… and comes to an end.

Look at all these cool things you can buy!

Anyway: That’s what Spirou 1386, from November 5th 1964, looks like. I think as we got to the 70s, each serial got more pages so that you didn’t have to wait five months to see how a story ended.

Why these comics were drawn half a page at a time is still a mystery.

NFLX2019 February 22nd: Firebrand

Awesome beard.

Firebrand. Aruna Raje. 2019. ☆☆★★★★

I never thought I’d say these words but:

*phew* Finally it’s another Indian movie!

This is a somewhat strange movie. It combines the aesthetics of a lighthearted drama with a rather distressing storyline about PTSD after rape.

This is a movie that seems to have avoided attention by the interwebs. It’s got 5.3/10 from 115 votes on imdb, which you’d think is minuscule for a movie on Netflix. I guess Netflix bought it to die in obscurity? Netflix’ strategy is still somewhat obscure to me.

I like the court proceedings, but nobody else does. I think the performances are OK… and the court stuff is interesting. The psychology stuff isn’t.

In any case, I’m afraid I have to agree with the entire Internet: This isn’t a very good movie. But it’s likeable, except for the Fraudian analysis bits.

The ending of this movie is… er… original…

This post is part of the NFLX2019 blog series.

NFLX2019 February 8th: High Flying Bird

High Flying Bird. Steven Soderbergh. 2019. ☆★★★★★

Everybody loved Steven Soderbergh after Sex, Lies, and Videotape, but then the rest of his movies happened. I mean, he’s got a bunch of blockbusters with the Oceans * movies (haven’t seen them), but he’s also done more ambitious movies, like his Solaris remake (I’ve seen it, but wasn’t… that… impressed?)

This is so not my kind of movie: It’s about sports. Some kind of American sports. You have a bunch of TV-like actors talking fast at the camera saying stuff like “I want the game”, and I’m over it.

But it’s not without qualities… the cinematography is kinda fun… and… uhm… OK, that’s it.

Oh fuck:

The film was shot using an iPhone 8 smartphone, equipped with an anamorphic lens produced by Moondog Labs.

So Soderbergh himself is up there in the actors’ faces with his tiny Iphone rig? That explains the intimate and fun (and very fish-eyed) camerawork. I like that bit.

But there’s not a single scene in this movie that didn’t give me cancer. The actors are delivering one Golden Age Of Television line after another, and it never stops.

I’ll give you a synopsis of the plot: It’s got… something… to do… with sports?

There are people who think this is a good movie. Perhaps they’re all Christian or sports fans?

But they’re wrong: This is a dreadful movie.

This post is part of the NFLX2019 blog series.

NFLX2019 February 1st: Velvet Buzzsaw


Velvet Buzzsaw. Dan Gilroy. 2019. ☆☆★★★★

Once again, this movie seems so calculated. It’s like they put random attractive movie traits (Gyllenaal as totally gay; the art scene; horror) through a blender and came up with this without anybody wanting to make this specific movie.

That doesn’t mean that this is horrible: Any scene is like randomly switching to a new TV station and there’s something odd going on there. But nothing adds up to anything, of course, because nothing is connected.

It’s such an odd movie. The scary scenes are totally un-scary (and signalled so far in advance), and the satirical art scene scenes are totally unfunny.

This is so close to being a John Carpenter early-80s horror movie. Only not scary. I think I’m starting to see a pattern here with the Netflix movies, with their Extruded Movie Product feel. But it’s still early days; perhaps it’s just a sampling artefact.

But… it looks good, I guess? And the performances are fine? And there are scenes here that seem to work?

It’s just one of those movies where you’re left wondering just how it ended up the mess it did.

This post is part of the NFLX2019 blog series.

NFLX2019 January 25th: Polar

Polar. Jonas Åkerlund. 2019. ☆☆☆☆☆★

Oh. Jonas Åkerlund? Did he just do the film about black metal Lords of Chaos? Hm… I see; that one was made a couple of years ago but not really released until now.

Anyway, I’m expecting something stylish with an excessive amount of violence, so I’ve got my pillow ready.

And this turns out just like I expected, only longer. I didn’t think Åkerlund could keep up this level of insane glee for almost two hours.

Not everybody liked it:

On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 19 out of 100, based on 12 critics, indicating “overwhelming dislike”.

The plot (based on a comic book by Víctor Santos) is perhaps the most moronic thing ever since the history of ever, but that only helps with the deranged mood of the film. You can only sit in slacked-jaw awe as things unfold.

I guess you could compare this to pieces of filth like The Kingsman, in that it has some of the expected “yaaah!” beats from the audience, but this movie isn’t a crime against all human feeling like that movie is: This is stupid, sure, but it’s fun.

This post is part of the NFLX2019 blog series.