Book Club 2025: Shadow Ticket by Thomas Pynchon

It feels like such an unexpected gift to have a new Pynchon book all of a sudden. I mean, it’s twelve years since the previous one, and they were coming at a pretty good clip for a while back then.

And if there one author I’m not worried about succumbing to Old Male Author Syndrome, it’s Pynchon, but still… I avoid reading reviews of books I’m going to read, but it’s been impossible to not get at least a glimpse of some of them over the past few weeks, and it seems like people aren’t really into the book? Except on Twitter, where people mostly seem to be making jokes about reading the book performatively. (Which, to be fair, is what Twitter is for.)

But… it’s fantastic! It’s absolutely everything I want from a Pynchon book. He’s still got it — it’s still jokes, puns, repartee, and then some lyrics from a song. It’s been such a sheer pleasure reading this book. I’ve laughed out loud a few times, I’ve groaned a few times, and when things suddenly take a turn for the serious (like at the end of chapter 35), I’ve felt a chill going down my spine.

So now I’m curious to skim some of the reviews, because I don’t get why people aren’t out in the streets celebrating a fantastic book. Let’s see… I’m just trying to think what people might not like. First of all, I can totally see not everybody being into Pynchon’s style, which is to overwhelm the reader slightly — lots of things are less than clearly delineated, and I can see how that would annoy some people who hate being confused. But I found that it worked perfectly for me — I’m reading a paragraph and metaphorically scratching my head, but I find that by the next paragraph, I’ve understood everything anyway, unconsciously.

And the plot? Well, I’m not really much bothered by plots in general, but I can see how some people would find it a bit unstructured — it’s a bit of a shaggy dog story, but I found it very satisfying anyway.

OK — time to google.

Wow:

Narrative traction dissipates and then falteringly coheres. Pretty much every paragraph is the same shape. It’s wearying. Which is to say that while there are pleasures here, the prose is seldom one of them.

*rolls eyes*

The New Yorker:

Your appetite might differ, but for me, nine novels in, all this code-cracking and jigsaw-puzzling is no longer thrilling. The same goes for the other bells and whistles of Pynchon’s style; even a seventy-million-trick pony is still a trick pony, and much of what once seemed clever in his canon now seems tiresome.

Some people just aren’t paying attention:

Around page 260, I was muttering to myself things like “Ugh, wait, so who is Porfirio del Vasto again?” But that’s okay. Like a long day at an amusement park during which you begin to grow weary and grouchy in the evening, you’ve already had enough fun not to let the last part spoil the fond memories of the whole day.

gasp:

The first half proceeds at a comparatively leisurely pace, but it too feels rushed. The rise of the dairy industry in late-nineteenth-century Wisconsin, with its almost missionary zeal for scientific farming, could have been the setting for a classic Pynchon fight between consolidating forces and unruly resisters. It’s easy to imagine him writing at length about the invention of pasteurized processed cheese, its chemical properties, and its use by the military, which supplied millions of pounds of it to soldiers during World War I. Yet there’s nothing about the transformation of Wisconsin from farms to pastureland, and Velveeta and Kraft are mentioned only in passing.

Yeah, my impressions were right — reviewers were not impressed by the book, for the most part. But they’re all wrong, so *pththt*.

There are some positive reviews, of course:

At 88, Pynchon has written his most urgent novel yet thanks to a newfound narrative grounding that maintains his distinctive style of cartoonish maximalism and high-flown beauty. It is filled with his famously overstuffed paragraphs, often one thrumming sentence each. But his words go down a bit more smoothly than usual without sacrificing any of his crackle. The result is a Pynchonian reduction simmered to delectation.

Shadow Ticket (2025) by Thomas Pynchon (buy new, buy used, 3.79 on Goodreads)

PCIe x4 v x16: The OCR GPU fight is on

So, I was randomly looking at the web page for the motherboard I’m using in the machine that I’m doing GPU-based OCR on (for the research site for magazines about comics). And…

I started wondering why one of the slots was marked with a metallic border. “Is it better because it’s closer to the CPU?”, I wondered. But… the pic says that they’re both x16?

But the manual says that while it’s physically x16, it’s electrically x4!!! *gasp* And that’s the slot I put my GPU in, because I thought the other slot was too close to the huge CPU cooler! I’m running the GPU at a quarter capacity! Or something! It cannot be!

But… it looks like it might actually fit in there? Let’s try…

YES!!! So I rebooted, and:

*gasp* It’s dead! I ruined the machine!

So I tried replugging, moving around the card, unplugging other things that use power… Yes, I’m running this mega-GPU’d machine headless (isn’t it ironic?), so I had no idea what was going on. I finally plugged in a monitor, and:

Yes, it’s that old “No keyboard detected, press F1 to run setup”.

I did so, and:

So that was why it disappeared off the net — when I moved the GPU card, the network interface chnaged name from enp6s0 to enp7s0.

Thanks, Lennart Poettering.

But does this all make a difference? Well, the 4x card OCR’d a random issue of CBG in:

-rw-r–r– 1 larsi larsi 177897681 2025-11-03 04:08:56.071143488 +0100 1204/results.json
-rw-r–r– 1 larsi larsi 169158769 2025-11-03 04:21:23.973956319 +0100 1205/results.json

That’s… 13m27s, I think.

And with x16?

12m6s. (/ (- 807.0 726) 807) => 0.10. So… 10% faster?

Oh, well. Totally worth it.

I guess it’s not all that surprising — the OCR happens on the GPU, so the only thing the PCIe bandwidth helps with is loading the model onto the card, and loading the page images (and exporting the page texts). So…

The moral here is: Always have a monitor connected, even if the machine is supposed to be a headless server.

October Music

Music I’ve bought in October.

Hey, that’s a lot of music all of a sudden — and most of it arrived a couple days ago, so I’ve only listened to most of these just a single time.

I’m using a forwarding service so things have a tendency to arrive all at once… Xmas in October.

The final Bowie box set is, er, not the most interesting one, to put it mildly, but I really enjoyed the Live in Montreaux discs — it’s a three hour concert, and it ends with them performing Low in its entirety! As a second encore! Bowie’s such fun.

I also enjoyed the remaster of Reality. Now, I’ve never liked that album much. I mean, even Bowie’s worst albums have some good tracks, and that’s true with Reality, too, but even so I’ve always found the album wholly bleh. It was originally mastered in typical 2003 fashioned — absolutely bricked, with no dynamics. The remaster is a typical 2025 remaster: Lots of dynamics, “separation”, and it bumps the bass a lot. That normally is pretty horrible, but it really suits Reality, and I found myself liking the album for the first time.

Opinions differ. Ahem. From Parlophone Finally Finishes Ruining David Bowie’s Catalog Mastering:

The original Heathen and Reality masters have a bit of top end glassiness, but they’re much better than John Webber’s new remasters in the box set (inevitably soon to be released individually). The remasters have an egregious bass boost, dried out atmospheres, and suffocated midrange transients. It sounds like a bad smiley-face EQ preset on your phone; was it “take your deaf toddler to work at the console” week at AIR Mastering?!

I bought the Joni’s Jazz four CD box, and man, it’s very strange. It has a handful of unreleased tracks, but it’s like 90% album tracks. And has over 60 tracks, which means that it has about a third of all the songs Joni Mitchell ever wrote? So it’s more of a career retrospective than anything else, and I don’t begrudge her doing something like that, but…

It’s just so badly sequenced.

Mitchell has always been mad at people for enjoying her earlier stuff more than her later stuff. She started being mad at people for that in the early 70s. And back then, it was warranted, because her greatest stuff was still to come. But then it stopped coming, and by the 90s, she was still writing pretty good stuff (and stuff that’s been undervalued), but it’s just not as good as Hissing Of Summer Lawns.

This collection is heavy on the later stuff, but is apparently randomly sequenced, so you have (as a random example) Sex Kills followed by Edith And The Kingpin, which just reminds you that Sex Kills isn’t as good as Edith And The Kingpin, in case you’d forgotten.

I’ve also been trying to buy more 70s albums I’ve never heard before! Not just box sets of stuff I’ve already heard! I know! It’s possible!

I’m veering into MOR-adjacent territories, which is scary, but there was a lot of good stuff back then…

But it’s possible to buy new music, too, I guess. Let’s see… what stood out from this month’s batch…

Nectax // 1-hour DJ mix ~ Jungle / D&B

I’ve been buying all the stuff from Nia Archive’s record label, Up Ya Archive, and it’s all good.

The New Eves - Cow Song

I also bought the album by The New Eves. They’ve been hyped a lot, but I think I quite like the album? I’ve only had time to listen to it once, mind you.

Yasmine Hamdan - Shmaali شمالي (Official Music Video)

Like everybody else, I quite like the Yasmine Hamdan album.

Automatic - Is It Now? (Official Music Video)

And also like everybody else, I like the Automatic album.

Water From Your Eyes - "Playing Classics" (Official Music Video)

I’m not sure about the new Water From Your Eyes album. The first album was an immediate classic, but this one isn’t. I mean, immediate. But perhaps I’ll love it after hearing it a few more times. (The album also suffers from not having a cover by Nicole Rifkin.)

an ephemeral radiant

One of my favourites ever, Nobukazu Takemura, finally has a new album out. It’s been a decade since the last one? I think it’s good, but I’m not sure.

Dj Sprinkles - Grand centrak Part I (MCDE Bassline Dub)

I finally bought that DJ Sprinkles album everybody’s been talking about for years, and it’s fine?

The Lencinho album is good…

Sudan Archives - A BUG'S LIFE (Official Music Video)

I’ve been a huge fan of Sudan Archives since her first EP, but the new album? THE BPM? I think it’s kinda boring. But again, only listened to it once.

Agriculture - Bodhidharma (Official Music Video)

I saw Agriculture live earlier this year, and they were awesome. I think the new album is good?

And that’s everything I can remember about this set of albums.

Random Comics

Hey, I read some comics. It’s been a couple of weeks, but I finally got comics reading again the past few days. Let’s see what’s what.

I’ve read a couple of Cameron Arthur’s comics before, and I’ve found them really intriguing, so it’s fun to see that this Hidden Islands collection seems to have gotten a bit of attention.

Because it’s really good. Arthur’s has such a strong sense of flow, and it’s like every panel has a lot of storytelling going on.

Each story is done in a somewhat different style, but it still feels very cohesive.

And it comes with a bookmark. Nice.

This was originally published in Spanish…

… and I first thought that this was one of those secret short story collections. You know the kind — everything about the book makes you think it’s a “graphic novel”, and then it turns out to just be a collection of random stuff, which always feels very sneaky. I mean, I like collections of stories, but I guess they sell less?

Anyway, this is not that, but I thought it was, because…

… each chapter is done in a somewhat different style, and seems like they have different characters, but then things become clearer: It’s all one narrative. And it’s a good one!

But… the first few chapters are kinda naff, and it’s not until the above one (which is about halfway in) that I started enjoying it.

I like some things about the artwork, but I don’t really enjoy looking at these figures. They feel very 2021 — the large, bulbous bodies and tiny heads; Corporate Memphis in comics form. And it’s a problem for the comics — there’s very little to distinguish faces, so you have to keep thinking “right; that’s the one with the slightly longer hair” to make sense of what’s happening.

But the good parts are very good; there’s some really original things going on in the storytelling. The ending is the most groan-worthy thing ever, though.

Yes, I bought another one of these DC Finest collections. This time around, it’s a collection of Superman and Action Comics from 1970-71, and as usual, there’s no stated rationale for why exactly these two comics are collected together, or why this particular time period.

All the artwork is by Curt Swan (and mostly Murphy Anderson on inks), so perhaps that’s the reason? In any case, Action Comics (seen above) is quite different from Superman (seen below) in this time period, and it makes for an interesting contrast.

Action Comics is rather still in the 50s/60s zany adventure mode, but not quite as zany as they used to be. It’s like it’s more aimed at nine year olds than five year olds?

Meanwhile, Superman (“The New Adventures Of”) has several b plots that go on for dozens of issues (written by Denny O’Neil), so it’s more like “modern” super-hero comics.

But is any of this any good?

Well, I read a few of these comics back when I was nine myself, and I haven’t read them for many, many decades, so it’s hard to say what’s nostalgia and what’s not, but I really enjoyed reading this collection. Everything is so low stakes — Superman doesn’t have to go on A Mission To Save All The Multiverses From Being Destroyed even once, and that’s so refreshing. It’s just very readable, somewhat silly stories with somewhat attractive artwork.

I think I’m going to buy more DC collections from the 70s, perhaps. It hits a sweet spot, at least for me.

Look at how many issues of Spirou I’ve read! Je suis très fier.

Spirou is very variable, though — whether it’s actually enjoyable depends on what they’re serialising, and this period has been, like, bad. The main serial are all so samey, and worse — after serialising one album, they start serialising the next one! It feels like it’s been months just of junk like L’île de minut…

… Mi-Mouche (ok, ce n’est pas horrible, mais…)…

… and Les sœurs Grémillet…

… et le pire, c’est Louca. Beurk!

Yes, yes, yes, I know, this is a magazine for children, but all these are just so samey.

OK, I was wrong — the worst thing is this atrocity above: It’s a story set in Champignac’s youth (yes, the genius from Spirou), which has him going to Japan to commit suicide by going to where the Americans are going to drop the atom bomb. (But because of a heavy cloud cover, they drop the bomb on Nagasaki istead.)

It’s so… tasteless.

But there’s some fun stuff in these issues, too, so it’s not a total loss.

I don’t know whether Dans mes yeux by Bastien Vivès has been translated yet?

Anyway, I’ve never read a comic quite like it. Yes, there’s been other comics told 100% from a first person perspective, but in this one, we don’t even get to hear what that person says: All we get is what he’s looking at, and what the person he’s talking with is saying. Yes, it’s gimmicky, but it works.

It’s also slightly unnerving, because we learn so little about the… well, I can’t call him “narrator”, because he doesn’t narrate anything. But it feels like it could set us up for some horrible twist ending, but I’m happy to report that that doesn’t happen. It’s just very interesting.

That the artwork is so attractive doesn’t hurt a bit, of course.

I’ve bought a bunch of comics from ebay sellers for a blogging project that’s going to start next year, but some sellers have included other comics — either as packing material, or just gifts, I guess?

I was really surprised to get three 60s/70s DC comics, for instance. Surely they can’t be worthless? So, er, thanks?

The Green Lantern/Green Arrow book is from that classic “socially relevant” run, which I read as a kid. Neal Adams is always fun to look at.

I’ve never read this Swamp Thing before. I guess this is from after Len Wein/Bernie Wrightson left the book or something? It’s OK, anyway.

And I’ve never read The Creeper before, and there are no credits in the book, but I guess this looks like Steve Ditko? Inked by… er… Gil Kane did the cover, but it doesn’t look like he’s the inker here? Could it be… Al Williamson? Just from looking at that bottom left-hand face.

I forgot to google this when I was reading it, so let’s do that now…

Mike Peppe! Never heard of.

Some new comics were also included. This Predator thing from Marvel is so clichéd that it reads almost like a parody — the protagonist gets the Trauma Background (because that’s the proscribed background for all protagonists now) and the plot is the Revenge Plot (because that’s the only plot that’s allowed this week).

But within those confines, it’s not awful.

*gasp* Fantagraphics published a new Tardi last year, and I didn’t notice. How is this even possible.

Anyway, this is written by Dominique Grange, and it’s really good.

The way it moves between different time periods is very slinky, but it’s basically about France in the 60s and 70s, and it’s about struggling against the Fascist regime and all that good stuff. It sometimes gets a bit bogged down, but it’s mostly totally exhilarating to read.

And Tardi’s artwork is as amazing as ever. I give the album eleven thumbs up.

I’ve now bought an album by Dominique Grange, because I’m wondering what her music is like.

OK, that’s it.